Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] eal: Set numa node value for system which not support it.

2017-06-26 Thread Thomas Monjalon
26/06/2017 14:50, Sergio Gonzalez Monroy: > On 26/06/2017 10:39, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 26/06/2017 11:14, Sergio Gonzalez Monroy: > >> On 23/06/2017 14:02, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > >>> 22/06/2017 17:15, Sergio Gonzalez Monroy: > Just fyi, the summary line should be lowercase apart from acr

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] eal: Set numa node value for system which not support it.

2017-06-26 Thread Sergio Gonzalez Monroy
On 26/06/2017 10:39, Thomas Monjalon wrote: 26/06/2017 11:14, Sergio Gonzalez Monroy: On 23/06/2017 14:02, Thomas Monjalon wrote: 22/06/2017 17:15, Sergio Gonzalez Monroy: Just fyi, the summary line should be lowercase apart from acronyms (DPDK guidelines). On 11/05/2017 02:56, Tonghao Zhang

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] eal: Set numa node value for system which not support it.

2017-06-26 Thread Thomas Monjalon
26/06/2017 11:14, Sergio Gonzalez Monroy: > On 23/06/2017 14:02, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 22/06/2017 17:15, Sergio Gonzalez Monroy: > >> Just fyi, the summary line should be lowercase apart from acronyms (DPDK > >> guidelines). > >> > >> On 11/05/2017 02:56, Tonghao Zhang wrote: > >>> The NUMA no

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] eal: Set numa node value for system which not support it.

2017-06-26 Thread Sergio Gonzalez Monroy
On 23/06/2017 14:02, Thomas Monjalon wrote: 22/06/2017 17:15, Sergio Gonzalez Monroy: Just fyi, the summary line should be lowercase apart from acronyms (DPDK guidelines). On 11/05/2017 02:56, Tonghao Zhang wrote: The NUMA node information for PCI devices provided through sysfs is invalid for

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] eal: Set numa node value for system which not support it.

2017-06-23 Thread Thomas Monjalon
22/06/2017 17:15, Sergio Gonzalez Monroy: > Just fyi, the summary line should be lowercase apart from acronyms (DPDK > guidelines). > > On 11/05/2017 02:56, Tonghao Zhang wrote: > > The NUMA node information for PCI devices provided through > > sysfs is invalid for AMD Opteron(TM) Processor 62xx

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] eal: Set numa node value for system which not support it.

2017-06-22 Thread Sergio Gonzalez Monroy
Just fyi, the summary line should be lowercase apart from acronyms (DPDK guidelines). On 11/05/2017 02:56, Tonghao Zhang wrote: The NUMA node information for PCI devices provided through sysfs is invalid for AMD Opteron(TM) Processor 62xx and 63xx on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6, and VMs on some

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] eal: Set numa node value for system which not support it.

2017-05-10 Thread Tonghao Zhang
The NUMA node information for PCI devices provided through sysfs is invalid for AMD Opteron(TM) Processor 62xx and 63xx on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6, and VMs on some hypervisors. It is good to see more checking for valid values. Signed-off-by: Tonghao Zhang --- lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_p