On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 06:39:13PM +, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> > struct rte_eth_dev *
> > rte_eth_dev_allocate(const char *name)
> > {
> > @@ -210,13 +223,41 @@ struct rte_eth_dev *
> > return NULL;
> > }
> >
> > - eth_dev = &rte_eth_devices[port_id];
> > - eth_dev->data =
On 1/9/2017 7:50 AM, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> Assume we have two virtio ports, 00:03.0 and 00:04.0. The first one is
> managed by the kernel driver, while the later one is managed by DPDK.
>
> Now we start the primary process. 00:03.0 will be skipped by DPDK virtio
> PMD driver (since it's being used
On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 02:32:03PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2017-01-10 22:33, Yuanhan Liu:
> > On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 06:08:04PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > Hi Yuanhan,
> > >
> > > Nit: the title should be "v4 1/6"
> >
> > Oops, my bad.
> >
> > > Except that, good patch :)
> > >
2017-01-10 22:33, Yuanhan Liu:
> On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 06:08:04PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > Hi Yuanhan,
> >
> > Nit: the title should be "v4 1/6"
>
> Oops, my bad.
>
> > Except that, good patch :)
> >
> > > Signed-off-by: Yuanhan Liu
> >
> > Acked-by: Thomas Monjalon
>
> Thanks fo
On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 06:08:04PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> Hi Yuanhan,
>
> Nit: the title should be "v4 1/6"
Oops, my bad.
> Except that, good patch :)
>
> > Signed-off-by: Yuanhan Liu
>
> Acked-by: Thomas Monjalon
Thanks for review! Mind if I apply it to the next-virtio tree?
Hi Yuanhan,
Nit: the title should be "v4 1/6"
Except that, good patch :)
> Signed-off-by: Yuanhan Liu
Acked-by: Thomas Monjalon
Assume we have two virtio ports, 00:03.0 and 00:04.0. The first one is
managed by the kernel driver, while the later one is managed by DPDK.
Now we start the primary process. 00:03.0 will be skipped by DPDK virtio
PMD driver (since it's being used by the kernel). 00:04.0 would be
successfully init
7 matches
Mail list logo
