04/07/2020 15:36, Jerin Jacob:
> On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 2:59 PM Bruce Richardson
> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 06:13:22PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > Bruce, as maintainer of l2fwd example, any opinion about this change?
> > >
> > Assuming all previous discussion on it is resolv
On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 2:59 PM Bruce Richardson
wrote:
>
> On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 06:13:22PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > Bruce, as maintainer of l2fwd example, any opinion about this change?
> >
> Assuming all previous discussion on it is resolved, I'm fine with this
> patch, though I susp
On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 06:13:22PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> Bruce, as maintainer of l2fwd example, any opinion about this change?
>
Assuming all previous discussion on it is resolved, I'm fine with this
patch, though I suspect it will only make 20.08 now.
Acked-by: Bruce Richardson
>
>
Bruce, as maintainer of l2fwd example, any opinion about this change?
11/05/2020 02:23, Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula:
> Hi Vipin,
>
> >Hi Pavan,
> >
> >snipped
> >> >
> >> >Should we check & warn the user if
> >> >1. port speed mismatch
> >> >2. on different NUMA
> >> >3. port pairs are physical
Hi Vipin,
>Hi Pavan,
>
>snipped
>> >
>> >Should we check & warn the user if
>> >1. port speed mismatch
>> >2. on different NUMA
>> >3. port pairs are physical and vdev like tap, and KNI (performance).
>> >
>>
>> Sure, it can be a separate patch as it will be applicable for multiple
>examples.
>I b
Hi Pavan,
snipped
> >
> >Should we check & warn the user if
> >1. port speed mismatch
> >2. on different NUMA
> >3. port pairs are physical and vdev like tap, and KNI (performance).
> >
>
> Sure, it can be a separate patch as it will be applicable for multiple
> examples.
I believe this patch is
>Hi Vamsi & Pavan,
>
>I like this idea, couple of queries
>
>snipped
>> +static int
>> +check_port_pair_config(void)
>> +{
>> +uint32_t port_pair_config_mask = 0;
>> +uint32_t port_pair_mask = 0;
>> +uint16_t index, i, portid;
>> +
>> +for (index = 0; index < nb_port_pair_params;
Hi Vamsi & Pavan,
I like this idea, couple of queries
snipped
> +static int
> +check_port_pair_config(void)
> +{
> + uint32_t port_pair_config_mask = 0;
> + uint32_t port_pair_mask = 0;
> + uint16_t index, i, portid;
> +
> + for (index = 0; index < nb_port_pair_params; index++) {
t;; Akhil Goyal ; Tomasz
>Kantecki ; Sunil Kumar Kori
>; Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula
>
>Cc: Andrzej Ostruszka [C] ; dev@dpdk.org; Vamsi
>Krishna Attunuru
>Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] examples/l2fwd: add cmdline option for
>forwarding port info
>
>From: Vamsi Attunuru
From: Vamsi Attunuru
Current l2fwd application statically configures adjacent ports as
destination ports for forwarding the traffic.
Add a portmap option to pass the forwarding port pair mapping which allows
the user to configure forwarding port mapping.
If no portmap argument is specified, des
10 matches
Mail list logo
