On Thu, 25 Mar 2021 15:03:24 +0300
"Medvedkin, Vladimir" wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> On 25/03/2021 00:28, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 08/05/2020 21:58, Vladimir Medvedkin:
> >> Currently DPDK has a special implementation of a hash table for
> >> 4 byte keys which is called FBK hash. Unfortunately i
Hi Thomas,
On 25/03/2021 00:28, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
08/05/2020 21:58, Vladimir Medvedkin:
Currently DPDK has a special implementation of a hash table for
4 byte keys which is called FBK hash. Unfortunately its main drawback
is that it only supports 2 byte values.
The new implementation calle
08/05/2020 21:58, Vladimir Medvedkin:
> Currently DPDK has a special implementation of a hash table for
> 4 byte keys which is called FBK hash. Unfortunately its main drawback
> is that it only supports 2 byte values.
> The new implementation called KV hash
> supports 4 byte keys and 8 byte associa
Waiting for reviews please.
08/05/2020 21:58, Vladimir Medvedkin:
> Currently DPDK has a special implementation of a hash table for
> 4 byte keys which is called FBK hash. Unfortunately its main drawback
> is that it only supports 2 byte values.
> The new implementation called KV hash
> supports 4
Currently DPDK has a special implementation of a hash table for
4 byte keys which is called FBK hash. Unfortunately its main drawback
is that it only supports 2 byte values.
The new implementation called KV hash
supports 4 byte keys and 8 byte associated values,
which is enough to store a pointer.
5 matches
Mail list logo