On 2/8/2017 4:46 PM, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Wu, Jingjing
>> Sent: Wednesday, February 8, 2017 5:06 AM
>> To: dev@dpdk.org
>> Cc: Wu, Jingjing ; olivier.m...@6wind.com; Zhang,
>> Helin ; Ananyev, Konstantin
>>
>> Subject: [PATCH v4 0/4] fix bitmask
> -Original Message-
> From: Yigit, Ferruh
> Sent: Thursday, February 9, 2017 12:33 AM
> To: Wu, Jingjing ; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: olivier.m...@6wind.com; Zhang, Helin ;
> Ananyev, Konstantin
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/4] fix bitmask of supported Tx flags
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Wu, Jingjing
> Sent: Wednesday, February 8, 2017 5:06 AM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Wu, Jingjing ; olivier.m...@6wind.com; Zhang,
> Helin ; Ananyev, Konstantin
>
> Subject: [PATCH v4 0/4] fix bitmask of supported Tx flags
>
> Some Tx offload flags are missed
On 2/8/2017 5:05 AM, Jingjing Wu wrote:
> Some Tx offload flags are missed in bitmask of all supported packet
> Tx flags, it will cause rte_eth_tx_prepare fails when Tx burst packets.
>
> v4 change:
> - add PKT_TX_IEEE1588_TMST to PKT_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK
>
> v3 changes:
> - add PKT_TX_MACSEC to PKT
Some Tx offload flags are missed in bitmask of all supported packet
Tx flags, it will cause rte_eth_tx_prepare fails when Tx burst packets.
v4 change:
- add PKT_TX_IEEE1588_TMST to PKT_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK
v3 changes:
- add PKT_TX_MACSEC to PKT_TX_OFFLOAD_MASK
- refine code of drivers' TX_OFFLOAD_M
5 matches
Mail list logo