On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 06:36:57PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> After rebasing the patchset, the compilation of each patch seems good.
> But the new checks fail with clang:
> rte_memcpy.h:814:2: error:
> implicit declaration of function '_mm_alignr_epi8' is invalid
> in C99
After rebasing the patchset, the compilation of each patch seems good.
But the new checks fail with clang:
rte_memcpy.h:814:2: error:
implicit declaration of function '_mm_alignr_epi8' is invalid
in C99
Other comments about the script:
- it is too long (can it be
2016-07-15 22:03, Bruce Richardson:
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 03:02:37PM +0200, Adrien Mazarguil wrote:
> > DPDK uses GNU C language extensions in most of its code base. This is fine
> > for internal source files whose compilation flags are controlled by DPDK,
> > however user applications that
On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 10:03:02PM +0100, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 03:02:37PM +0200, Adrien Mazarguil wrote:
> > DPDK uses GNU C language extensions in most of its code base. This is fine
> > for internal source files whose compilation flags are controlled by DPDK,
> >
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 03:02:37PM +0200, Adrien Mazarguil wrote:
> DPDK uses GNU C language extensions in most of its code base. This is fine
> for internal source files whose compilation flags are controlled by DPDK,
> however user applications that use exported "public" headers may experience
>
DPDK uses GNU C language extensions in most of its code base. This is fine
for internal source files whose compilation flags are controlled by DPDK,
however user applications that use exported "public" headers may experience
compilation failures when enabling strict error/standard checks (-std and
6 matches
Mail list logo
