Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 00/11] bbdev PMD ACC100

2020-09-22 Thread Chautru, Nicolas
Hi Akhil, > > Hi Nicolas, > > > > > Hi Akhil, > > Just a heads up on this bbdev PMD which is ready and was reviewed for > > some time by the community. > > There is one warning on patchwork but it can be ignored (one ack email > > sent with bad formatting). > > Thanks and best regards, > > Nic >

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 00/11] bbdev PMD ACC100

2020-09-22 Thread Akhil Goyal
Hi Nicolas, > > Hi Akhil, > Just a heads up on this bbdev PMD which is ready and was reviewed for some > time by the community. > There is one warning on patchwork but it can be ignored (one ack email sent > with bad formatting). > Thanks and best regards, > Nic There are changes in Makefiles, wh

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 00/11] bbdev PMD ACC100

2020-09-21 Thread Chautru, Nicolas
Hi Akhil, Just a heads up on this bbdev PMD which is ready and was reviewed for some time by the community. There is one warning on patchwork but it can be ignored (one ack email sent with bad formatting). Thanks and best regards, Nic > -Original Message- > From: Chautru, Nicolas > S

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 00/11] bbdev PMD ACC100

2020-09-04 Thread Nicolas Chautru
v4: an odd compilation error is reported for one CI variant using "gcc latest" which looks to me like a false positive of maybe-undeclared. http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/test-report/2020-August/148936.html Still forcing a dummy declare to remove this CI warning I will check with c...@dpdk.org in