On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 10:00:10PM +0200, Olivier Matz wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 09:19:32AM +, Yongseok Koh wrote:
> > > On Apr 25, 2018, at 2:08 AM, Yongseok Koh wrote:
> > >> On Apr 25, 2018, at 1:28 AM, Olivier Matz wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hi Yongseok,
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Apr 24, 2
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 09:19:32AM +, Yongseok Koh wrote:
> > On Apr 25, 2018, at 2:08 AM, Yongseok Koh wrote:
> >> On Apr 25, 2018, at 1:28 AM, Olivier Matz wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Yongseok,
> >>
> >> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 06:02:44PM +0200, Olivier Matz wrote:
> > @@ -688,14 +704,33 @@ r
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 05:45:34PM +0300, Andrew Rybchenko wrote:
> On 04/25/2018 02:34 AM, Yongseok Koh wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 09:15:38PM +0200, Olivier Matz wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 09:21:00PM +0300, Andrew Rybchenko wrote:
> > > > On 04/24/2018 07:02 PM, Olivier Matz wrot
On Tue, 24 Apr 2018 22:22:45 +0200
Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > >
> > > I guess the problem that it changes INDIRECT semantics since EXTBUF
> > > is added as well. I think strictly speaking it is an API change.
> > > Is it OK to make it without announcement?
> >
> > In any case, there will be a
On 04/25/2018 02:34 AM, Yongseok Koh wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 09:15:38PM +0200, Olivier Matz wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 09:21:00PM +0300, Andrew Rybchenko wrote:
On 04/24/2018 07:02 PM, Olivier Matz wrote:
+ m->ol_flags |= EXT_ATTACHED_MBUF;
+ m->shinfo = shinfo;
+
+
> On Apr 25, 2018, at 2:08 AM, Yongseok Koh wrote:
>> On Apr 25, 2018, at 1:28 AM, Olivier Matz wrote:
>>
>> Hi Yongseok,
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 06:02:44PM +0200, Olivier Matz wrote:
> @@ -688,14 +704,33 @@ rte_mbuf_to_baddr(struct rte_mbuf *md)
> }
> /**
> + * Returns TR
> On Apr 25, 2018, at 1:28 AM, Olivier Matz wrote:
>
> Hi Yongseok,
>
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 06:02:44PM +0200, Olivier Matz wrote:
@@ -688,14 +704,33 @@ rte_mbuf_to_baddr(struct rte_mbuf *md)
}
/**
+ * Returns TRUE if given mbuf is cloned by mbuf indirection, or FALSE
Hi Yongseok,
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 06:02:44PM +0200, Olivier Matz wrote:
> > > @@ -688,14 +704,33 @@ rte_mbuf_to_baddr(struct rte_mbuf *md)
> > > }
> > > /**
> > > + * Returns TRUE if given mbuf is cloned by mbuf indirection, or FALSE
> > > + * otherwise.
> > > + *
> > > + * If a mbuf has it
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 02:53:41PM -0700, Yongseok Koh wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 10:22:45PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 24/04/2018 21:15, Olivier Matz:
> > > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 09:21:00PM +0300, Andrew Rybchenko wrote:
> > > > On 04/24/2018 07:02 PM, Olivier Matz wrote:
> > > > >
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 09:15:38PM +0200, Olivier Matz wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 09:21:00PM +0300, Andrew Rybchenko wrote:
> > On 04/24/2018 07:02 PM, Olivier Matz wrote:
> > > Hi Andrew, Yongseok,
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 03:28:33PM +0300, Andrew Rybchenko wrote:
> > > > On 04/2
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 03:28:33PM +0300, Andrew Rybchenko wrote:
> On 04/24/2018 04:38 AM, Yongseok Koh wrote:
[...]
> > diff --git a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h
> > index 06eceba37..7f6507a66 100644
> > --- a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h
> > +++ b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbu
24/04/2018 23:53, Yongseok Koh:
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 10:22:45PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 24/04/2018 21:15, Olivier Matz:
> > > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 09:21:00PM +0300, Andrew Rybchenko wrote:
> > > > On 04/24/2018 07:02 PM, Olivier Matz wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 03:28:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 10:22:45PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 24/04/2018 21:15, Olivier Matz:
> > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 09:21:00PM +0300, Andrew Rybchenko wrote:
> > > On 04/24/2018 07:02 PM, Olivier Matz wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 03:28:33PM +0300, Andrew Rybchenko wrote:
> > >
24/04/2018 21:15, Olivier Matz:
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 09:21:00PM +0300, Andrew Rybchenko wrote:
> > On 04/24/2018 07:02 PM, Olivier Matz wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 03:28:33PM +0300, Andrew Rybchenko wrote:
> > > > On 04/24/2018 04:38 AM, Yongseok Koh wrote:
> > > > > + * Returns TRUE
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 09:21:00PM +0300, Andrew Rybchenko wrote:
> On 04/24/2018 07:02 PM, Olivier Matz wrote:
> > Hi Andrew, Yongseok,
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 03:28:33PM +0300, Andrew Rybchenko wrote:
> > > On 04/24/2018 04:38 AM, Yongseok Koh wrote:
> > > > This patch introduces a new w
Hi Andrew, Yongseok,
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 03:28:33PM +0300, Andrew Rybchenko wrote:
> On 04/24/2018 04:38 AM, Yongseok Koh wrote:
> > This patch introduces a new way of attaching an external buffer to a mbuf.
> >
> > Attaching an external buffer is quite similar to mbuf indirection in
> > repl
On 04/24/2018 04:38 AM, Yongseok Koh wrote:
This patch introduces a new way of attaching an external buffer to a mbuf.
Attaching an external buffer is quite similar to mbuf indirection in
replacing buffer addresses and length of a mbuf, but a few differences:
- When an indirect mbuf is attach
On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 10:01:07PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Apr 2018 18:38:53 -0700
> Yongseok Koh wrote:
>
> > This patch introduces a new way of attaching an external buffer to a mbuf.
> >
> > Attaching an external buffer is quite similar to mbuf indirection in
> > replacin
On Mon, 23 Apr 2018 18:38:53 -0700
Yongseok Koh wrote:
> This patch introduces a new way of attaching an external buffer to a mbuf.
>
> Attaching an external buffer is quite similar to mbuf indirection in
> replacing buffer addresses and length of a mbuf, but a few differences:
> - When an ind
This patch introduces a new way of attaching an external buffer to a mbuf.
Attaching an external buffer is quite similar to mbuf indirection in
replacing buffer addresses and length of a mbuf, but a few differences:
- When an indirect mbuf is attached, refcnt of the direct mbuf would be
2 as
20 matches
Mail list logo
