On 9/21/2020 3:06 AM, Chengchang Tang wrote:
Hi, All
These Patches improved procinfo was stuck in patchwork:
https://patchwork.dpdk.org/patch/74960/
These patches look good for me. Will these be applied?
I'm not sure what to do next. If these will be applied, I need modified
the code.
Hi Chen
Hi, All
These Patches improved procinfo was stuck in patchwork:
https://patchwork.dpdk.org/patch/74960/
These patches look good for me. Will these be applied?
I'm not sure what to do next. If these will be applied, I need modified
the code.
On 2020/9/19 6:11, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Mon, 7
On Mon, 7 Sep 2020 17:14:48 +0800
Chengchang Tang wrote:
> On 2020/9/6 0:59, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > On Sat, 5 Sep 2020 17:07:32 +0800
> > Chengchang Tang wrote:
> >
> >>printf("\t -- queue %d rx scatter %d"
> >>" d
On 2020/9/6 0:59, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Sep 2020 17:07:32 +0800
> Chengchang Tang wrote:
>
>> printf("\t -- queue %d rx scatter %d"
>> " descriptors %d"
>> +" r
On Sat, 5 Sep 2020 17:07:32 +0800
Chengchang Tang wrote:
> printf("\t -- queue %d rx scatter %d"
> " descriptors %d"
> + " rx buffer size %d"
>
Add Rx buffer size to show_port function to display it in the port PMD
information so that the user can get the buffer length used by HW queue
of receiving packets.
Signed-off-by: Chengchang Tang
---
app/proc-info/main.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/app/proc-info/main.c
6 matches
Mail list logo
