As found in rte_lpm6_free the two lpm interfaces rte_lpm_free_v20 and
rte_lpm_free_v1604 had a leak.
rte_lpm_free_v20 might have missed to free rules_tbl
rte_lpm_free_v1604 due to an early exit might have missed to free
rules_tbl and lpm itself.
Acked-by: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz at 6wind.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Ehrhardt <christian.ehrhardt at canonical.com>
---
lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.c | 10 ++++------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.c b/lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.c
index 59ce5a7..af5811c 100644
--- a/lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.c
+++ b/lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.c
@@ -367,6 +367,7 @@ rte_lpm_free_v20(struct rte_lpm_v20 *lpm)
rte_rwlock_write_unlock(RTE_EAL_TAILQ_RWLOCK);
+ rte_free(lpm->rules_tbl);
rte_free(lpm);
rte_free(te);
}
@@ -391,15 +392,12 @@ rte_lpm_free_v1604(struct rte_lpm *lpm)
if (te->data == (void *) lpm)
break;
}
- if (te == NULL) {
- rte_rwlock_write_unlock(RTE_EAL_TAILQ_RWLOCK);
- return;
- }
-
- TAILQ_REMOVE(lpm_list, te, next);
+ if (te != NULL)
+ TAILQ_REMOVE(lpm_list, te, next);
rte_rwlock_write_unlock(RTE_EAL_TAILQ_RWLOCK);
+ rte_free(lpm->rules_tbl);
rte_free(lpm);
rte_free(te);
}
--
2.7.3
