This patch adds CPU flags which will enable the detection of ISA
features available on more recent x86 based CPUs.
The CPUID leaf information can be found in
Table 1-2. "Information Returned by CPUID Instruction" of this document:
https://software.intel.com/sites/default/files/managed/c5/15/archit
On 28/04/2020 13:40, Kevin Laatz wrote:
> This patch adds CPU flags which will enable the detection of ISA
> features available on more recent x86 based CPUs.
>
> The CPUID leaf information can be found in
> Table 1-2. "Information Returned by CPUID Instruction" of this document:
> https://soft
> > ---
> > devtools/libabigail.abignore | 5 +
> > lib/librte_eal/x86/include/rte_cpuflags.h | 19 +++
> > lib/librte_eal/x86/rte_cpuflags.c | 18 ++
> > 3 files changed, 42 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/devtools/libabigail.abignore
28/04/2020 20:11, Laatz, Kevin:
> > > --- a/devtools/libabigail.abignore
> > > +++ b/devtools/libabigail.abignore
> >
> > Kevin - you still have the surpession.
> > I am testing locally with 1.7.1, and it doesn't complain when I disable the
> > supression.
> > Are you seeing something different?
>
On Tue, 28 Apr 2020 17:39:24 +0100
Ray Kinsella wrote:
> > +
> > /* The last item */
> > RTE_CPUFLAG_NUMFLAGS, /**< This should always be the
> > last! */
> > };
These kind of enums break API's. We should remove them all in 20.11.
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 6:39 PM Ray Kinsella wrote:
> > diff --git a/devtools/libabigail.abignore b/devtools/libabigail.abignore
> > index a59df8f13..045f436fb 100644
> > --- a/devtools/libabigail.abignore
> > +++ b/devtools/libabigail.abignore
>
> Kevin - you still have the surpession.
> I am tes
So that isn't the issue either.
$ grep RTE_CPUFLAG_NUMFLAGS build-gcc-shared/install/dump/librte_eal.dump
4646:
$ grep RTE_CPUFLAG_NUMFLAGS
/build/dpdk/reference/v20.02/build-gcc-shared/dump/librte_eal.dump
3296:
1.7-1.fc31
> Acked-By: Ray Kinsella
Applied, thanks
8 matches
Mail list logo
