On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 11:17 AM Jakub Grajciar -X (jgrajcia -
PANTHEON TECH SRO at Cisco) wrote:
> > > On 8/22/2019 9:18 AM, Jakub Grajciar wrote:
> > > > Zero-copy slave support for memif PMD.
> > > > Slave interface exposes DPDK memory to master interface. Only single
> > > > file segments are
> > On 8/22/2019 9:18 AM, Jakub Grajciar wrote:
> > > Zero-copy slave support for memif PMD.
> > > Slave interface exposes DPDK memory to master interface. Only single
> > > file segments are supported (EAL option --single-file-segments).
>
> Do you really want this additional configuration in y
On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 6:45 PM Yigit, Ferruh
wrote:
>
> On 8/22/2019 9:18 AM, Jakub Grajciar wrote:
> > Zero-copy slave support for memif PMD.
> > Slave interface exposes DPDK memory to
> > master interface. Only single file segments
> > are supported (EAL option --single-file-segments).
Do you
On 8/22/2019 9:18 AM, Jakub Grajciar wrote:
> Zero-copy slave support for memif PMD.
> Slave interface exposes DPDK memory to
> master interface. Only single file segments
> are supported (EAL option --single-file-segments).
>
> Signed-off-by: Jakub Grajciar
Reviewed-by: Ferruh Yigit
Since bin
On 10/17/2019 5:45 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 10/17/2019 5:04 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
>> On 10/17/2019 12:52 PM, Jakub Grajciar -X (jgrajcia - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES
>> at
>> Cisco) wrote:
>>>
Hi Jakub,
Just to double check if anyone is looking into the bind() error issue
whi
On 10/17/2019 5:04 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 10/17/2019 12:52 PM, Jakub Grajciar -X (jgrajcia - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at
> Cisco) wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Jakub,
>>>
>>> Just to double check if anyone is looking into the bind() error issue which
>>> is
>>> since following commit, I am waiting for more
On 10/17/2019 12:52 PM, Jakub Grajciar -X (jgrajcia - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at
Cisco) wrote:
>
>> Hi Jakub,
>>
>> Just to double check if anyone is looking into the bind() error issue which
>> is
>> since following commit, I am waiting for more input on it.
>>
>> Commit b923866c6974 ("net/memif:
> Hi Jakub,
>
> Just to double check if anyone is looking into the bind() error issue which is
> since following commit, I am waiting for more input on it.
>
> Commit b923866c6974 ("net/memif: allow for full key size in socket name")
> Cc: step...@networkplumber.org
Definitely an issue, I must
On 10/4/2019 2:23 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 8/22/2019 9:18 AM, Jakub Grajciar wrote:
>> Zero-copy slave support for memif PMD.
>> Slave interface exposes DPDK memory to
>> master interface. Only single file segments
>> are supported (EAL option --single-file-segments).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jakub
On 8/22/2019 9:18 AM, Jakub Grajciar wrote:
> Zero-copy slave support for memif PMD.
> Slave interface exposes DPDK memory to
> master interface. Only single file segments
> are supported (EAL option --single-file-segments).
>
> Signed-off-by: Jakub Grajciar
> ---
> doc/guides/nics/memif.rst
Zero-copy slave support for memif PMD.
Slave interface exposes DPDK memory to
master interface. Only single file segments
are supported (EAL option --single-file-segments).
Signed-off-by: Jakub Grajciar
---
doc/guides/nics/memif.rst | 42 +-
drivers/net/memif/Makefile
11 matches
Mail list logo