dk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/4] examples/ipsec-secgw: add fallback
> session feature
>
> Inline processing is limited to a specified subset of traffic. It is often
> unable to
> handle more complicated situations, such as fragmented traffic. When using
> inline processing such traffic is dropp
> -Original Message-
> From: Ananyev, Konstantin
> Sent: Sunday, September 29, 2019 7:04 PM
> To: Smoczynski, MarcinX ;
> ano...@marvell.com; akhil.go...@nxp.com
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v5 2/4] examples/ipsec-secgw: add fallback session
> feature
>
> Hi Marcin,
>
> >
>
Hi Marcin,
>
> diff --git a/doc/guides/sample_app_ug/ipsec_secgw.rst
> b/doc/guides/sample_app_ug/ipsec_secgw.rst
> index ad2d79e75..21b4b4418 100644
> --- a/doc/guides/sample_app_ug/ipsec_secgw.rst
> +++ b/doc/guides/sample_app_ug/ipsec_secgw.rst
> @@ -401,7 +401,7 @@ The SA rule syntax is show
Inline processing is limited to a specified subset of traffic. It is
often unable to handle more complicated situations, such as fragmented
traffic. When using inline processing such traffic is dropped.
Introduce fallback session for inline processing allowing processing
packets that normally woul
4 matches
Mail list logo
