On Tuesday 17 January 2017 03:28 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
On 1/17/2017 4:54 AM, Shreyansh Jain wrote:
Hello Ferruh,
On Tuesday 17 January 2017 01:23 AM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
On 1/16/2017 3:38 PM, Shreyansh Jain wrote:
Matching of PCI device address and driver ID table is being done at two
discr
On Monday 16 January 2017 11:54 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jan 2017 21:08:22 +0530
Shreyansh Jain wrote:
-rte_eal_pci_probe_one_driver(struct rte_pci_driver *dr, struct rte_pci_device
*dev)
+int
+rte_pci_match(struct rte_pci_driver *pci_drv,
+ struct rte_pci_devic
On 1/17/2017 4:54 AM, Shreyansh Jain wrote:
> Hello Ferruh,
>
> On Tuesday 17 January 2017 01:23 AM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
>> On 1/16/2017 3:38 PM, Shreyansh Jain wrote:
>>> Matching of PCI device address and driver ID table is being done at two
>>> discreet locations duplicating the code. (rte_eal_
Hello Ferruh,
On Tuesday 17 January 2017 01:23 AM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
On 1/16/2017 3:38 PM, Shreyansh Jain wrote:
Matching of PCI device address and driver ID table is being done at two
discreet locations duplicating the code. (rte_eal_pci_probe_one_driver
and rte_eal_pci_detach_dev).
Splitti
On 1/16/2017 3:38 PM, Shreyansh Jain wrote:
> Matching of PCI device address and driver ID table is being done at two
> discreet locations duplicating the code. (rte_eal_pci_probe_one_driver
> and rte_eal_pci_detach_dev).
>
> Splitting the matching function into a public fn rte_pci_match.
>
> Sig
On Mon, 16 Jan 2017 21:08:22 +0530
Shreyansh Jain wrote:
> -rte_eal_pci_probe_one_driver(struct rte_pci_driver *dr, struct
> rte_pci_device *dev)
> +int
> +rte_pci_match(struct rte_pci_driver *pci_drv,
> + struct rte_pci_device *pci_dev)
Use const?
Matching of PCI device address and driver ID table is being done at two
discreet locations duplicating the code. (rte_eal_pci_probe_one_driver
and rte_eal_pci_detach_dev).
Splitting the matching function into a public fn rte_pci_match.
Signed-off-by: Shreyansh Jain
---
lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal
7 matches
Mail list logo