[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 0/4] User-space Ethtool

2015-06-24 Thread David Harton (dharton)
Acked-by: David Harton > -Original Message- > From: Liang-Min Larry Wang [mailto:liang-min.wang at intel.com] > Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2015 6:22 PM > To: dev at dpdk.org > Cc: Andrew Harvey (agh); David Harton (dharton); Roger Melton (rmelton); > Liang-Min Larry Wang > Subject: [PATCH

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 0/4] User-space Ethtool

2015-06-24 Thread Andrew Harvey (agh)
On 6/17/15, 3:22 PM, "Liang-Min Larry Wang" wrote: >This implementation is designed to provide a familar interface for >applications that rely on kernel-space driver to support ethtool_op and >net_device_op for device management. The initial implementation focuses >on ops that can be implemented

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 0/4] User-space Ethtool

2015-06-23 Thread Wang, Liang-min
Stephen, From: Wang, Liang-min Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2015 8:47 AM To: Stephen Hemminger Cc: dev at dpdk.org Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 0/4] User-space Ethtool >>I agree with having a more complete API, but have some nits to pick. >>Could the API be more abstract to reduc

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 0/4] User-space Ethtool

2015-06-18 Thread Wang, Liang-min
>I agree with having a more complete API, but have some nits to pick. >Could the API be more abstract to reduce ABI issues in future? Which API? Are you referring to the APIs over ethdev level, or something else? More abstract on input/output data structure definition or else? Could you be more

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 0/4] User-space Ethtool

2015-06-17 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 6:22 PM, Liang-Min Larry Wang < liang-min.wang at intel.com> wrote: > This implementation is designed to provide a familar interface for > applications that rely on kernel-space driver to support ethtool_op and > net_device_op for device management. The initial