[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/3]: Add LRO support to ixgbe PMD

2015-03-18 Thread Vlad Zolotarov
This series adds the missing flow for enabling the LRO in the ethdev and adds a support for this feature in the ixgbe PMD. There is a big hope that this initiative is going to be picked up by some Intel developer that would add the LRO support to other Intel PMDs. The series starts with some clea

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/3]: Add LRO support to ixgbe PMD

2015-03-29 Thread Vlad Zolotarov
On 03/18/15 19:52, Vlad Zolotarov wrote: > This series adds the missing flow for enabling the LRO in the ethdev and > adds a support for this feature in the ixgbe PMD. There is a big hope that > this > initiative is going to be picked up by some Intel developer that would add > the LRO support

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/3]: Add LRO support to ixgbe PMD

2015-04-22 Thread Zhang, Helin
ery much! Regards, Helin > -Original Message- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Vlad Zolotarov > Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2015 1:52 AM > To: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/3]: Add LRO support to ixgbe PMD > > This series adds the missi

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/3]: Add LRO support to ixgbe PMD

2015-04-21 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Apr 21, 2015 6:23 PM, "Zhang, Helin" wrote: > > Hi Vlad > > I have a concern about the code changes you added in ixgbe_type.h. > For ixgbe, all source files in librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe, except ixgbe_osdep.h were called as "base driver", which was not developed by DPDK developers, and released by

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/3]: Add LRO support to ixgbe PMD

2015-04-22 Thread Zhang, Helin
Hemminger [mailto:step...@networkplumber.org] Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2015 9:46 AM To: Zhang, Helin Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Vlad Zolotarov Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/3]: Add LRO support to ixgbe PMD On Apr 21, 2015 6:23 PM, "Zhang, Helin" mailto:helin.zhang at intel.com>> wr

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/3]: Add LRO support to ixgbe PMD

2015-04-21 Thread Stephen Hemminger
Linux forced Intel to change away from the base driver model, and at this point as many patches come from community as Intel. The "base driver" model is not sustainable over the long term in my admittedly biased opinion.

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/3]: Add LRO support to ixgbe PMD

2015-04-21 Thread Stephen Hemminger
Just look how much dead code is in the base driver

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/3]: Add LRO support to ixgbe PMD

2015-04-22 Thread Vlad Zolotarov
e- >> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Vlad Zolotarov >> Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2015 1:52 AM >> To: dev at dpdk.org >> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/3]: Add LRO support to ixgbe PMD >> >> This series adds the missing flow for enabling

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/3]: Add LRO support to ixgbe PMD

2015-04-22 Thread Zhang, Helin
pdk.org > Cc: Ananyev, Konstantin > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/3]: Add LRO support to ixgbe PMD > > > > On 04/22/15 04:23, Zhang, Helin wrote: > > Hi Vlad > > > > I have a concern about the code changes you added in ixgbe_type.h. > > Helin, v9

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/3]: Add LRO support to ixgbe PMD

2015-04-22 Thread Vlad Zolotarov
hat we did before. This will save our maintaining efforts in the future. >> Also we >> have similar rules for e1000, i40e, fm10k. Thank you very much! >>> Regards, >>> Helin >>> >>>> -Original Message- >>>> From: dev [mailto:dev

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/3]: Add LRO support to ixgbe PMD

2015-04-23 Thread Zhang, Helin
yev, Konstantin > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/3]: Add LRO support to ixgbe PMD > > > > On 04/22/15 08:28, Zhang, Helin wrote: > > Vlad, how about the new elements added? E.g. rx_vec_allowed was added in > struct ixgbe_hw in ixgbe_type.h. > > If memory (and sig

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/3]: Add LRO support to ixgbe PMD

2015-04-23 Thread Ananyev, Konstantin
April 23, 2015 1:28 AM > To: Vlad Zolotarov; dev at dpdk.org > Cc: Ananyev, Konstantin > Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/3]: Add LRO support to ixgbe PMD > > Vlad > > OK. Thanks! We will try to see if a follow up patch set can be submitted soon. > > Regards,

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/3]: Add LRO support to ixgbe PMD

2015-04-23 Thread Vladislav Zolotarov
gt; > > > -Original Message- > > From: Zhang, Helin > > Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2015 1:28 AM > > To: Vlad Zolotarov; dev at dpdk.org > > Cc: Ananyev, Konstantin > > Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/3]: Add LRO support to ixgbe PMD > &g

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/3]: Add LRO support to ixgbe PMD

2015-04-23 Thread Ananyev, Konstantin
> From: Vladislav Zolotarov [mailto:vladz at cloudius-systems.com] > Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2015 12:02 PM > To: Ananyev, Konstantin > Cc: Zhang, Helin; dev at dpdk.org > Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/3]: Add LRO support to ixgbe PMD > > > On Apr 23, 2015 12:20

[dpdk-dev] [dpdk=dev] [PATCH v8 0/3]: Add LRO support to ixgbe PMD

2015-03-18 Thread Vlad Zolotarov
This series adds the missing flow for enabling the LRO in the ethdev and adds a support for this feature in the ixgbe PMD. There is a big hope that this initiative is going to be picked up by some Intel developer that would add the LRO support to other Intel PMDs. The series starts with some clea

[dpdk-dev] [dpdk=dev] [PATCH v8 0/3]: Add LRO support to ixgbe PMD

2015-03-18 Thread Vlad Zolotarov
There was a typo in a format-patch command - pls., ignore the whole series. I'm respinning it with the proper subject. On 03/18/15 19:48, Vlad Zolotarov wrote: > This series adds the missing flow for enabling the LRO in the ethdev and > adds a support for this feature in the ixgbe PMD. There is