[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/4] examples: add performance-thread

2015-12-06 Thread Betts, Ian
-Original Message- From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monja...@6wind.com] Sent: Saturday, December 5, 2015 9:21 PM To: Stephen Hemminger; Glynn, Michael J; Betts, Ian Cc: dev at dpdk.org; O'Driscoll, Tim; Richardson, Bruce Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/4] examples: add perfor

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/4] examples: add performance-thread

2015-12-05 Thread Thomas Monjalon
> > > Intel may have some milestone to get it into DPDK 2.2 but really this > > > seems too late... > > > > >>>Yes, sure it is too late to have enough discussions in 2.2 timeframe > > >Just to understand what we mean by too late... > > >The original RFC was issued on 2nd September. > > >Thus ther

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/4] examples: add performance-thread

2015-12-05 Thread Glynn, Michael J
-Original Message- From: Betts, Ian Sent: Saturday, December 5, 2015 12:07 PM To: Thomas Monjalon; Stephen Hemminger Cc: dev at dpdk.org; O'Driscoll, Tim; Richardson, Bruce; Glynn, Michael J Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/4] examples: add performance-thread -Original Me

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/4] examples: add performance-thread

2015-12-05 Thread Betts, Ian
-Original Message- From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monja...@6wind.com] Sent: Friday, December 4, 2015 6:34 PM To: Stephen Hemminger Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Betts, Ian Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/4] examples: add performance-thread 2015-12-04 10:03, Stephen Hemminger: > Lo

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/4] examples: add performance-thread

2015-12-05 Thread Stephen Hemminger
lynn, Michael J > Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/4] examples: add performance-thread > > > -Original Message- > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com] > Sent: Friday, December 4, 2015 6:34 PM > To: Stephen Hemminger > Cc: dev at dpdk.org;

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/4] examples: add performance-thread

2015-12-04 Thread Betts, Ian
-Original Message- From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:step...@networkplumber.org] Sent: Friday, December 4, 2015 6:04 PM To: Betts, Ian Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Richardson, Bruce Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/4] examples: add performance-thread >Looks useful, but this needs more discussion. >Maybe

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/4] examples: add performance-thread

2015-12-04 Thread Thomas Monjalon
2015-12-04 10:03, Stephen Hemminger: > Looks useful, but this needs more discussion. > > Maybe it should be a separate library not tied into DPDK so > it gets wider use and testing? Also what are the limitations? > What if an lthread did a system call? What about interaction > with rte_poll? > >

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/4] examples: add performance-thread

2015-12-04 Thread Kulasek, TomaszX
> -Original Message- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Ian Betts > Sent: Friday, December 4, 2015 11:34 > To: dev at dpdk.org > Cc: Betts, Ian > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/4] examples: add performance-thread > > This patchset compri

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/4] examples: add performance-thread

2015-12-04 Thread Ian Betts
This patchset comprises a layer 3 forwarding derivative intended to facilitate characterization of performance with different threading models, specifically:- 1. EAL threads running on different physical cores 2. EAL threads running on the same physical core 3. Lightweight threads running in an EA

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/4] examples: add performance-thread

2015-12-04 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Fri, 4 Dec 2015 10:34:21 + Ian Betts wrote: > This patchset comprises a layer 3 forwarding derivative intended to > facilitate characterization of performance with different > threading models, specifically:- > > 1. EAL threads running on different physical cores > 2. EAL threads running