On 10/31/19 7:48 PM, Viacheslav Ovsiienko wrote:
> The dynamic mbuf fields were introduced by [1]. The egress metadata is
> good candidate to be moved from statically allocated field tx_metadata to
> dynamic one. Because mbufs are used in half-duplex fashion only, it is
> safe to share this dynamic
On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 04:48:26PM +, Viacheslav Ovsiienko wrote:
> The dynamic mbuf fields were introduced by [1]. The egress metadata is
> good candidate to be moved from statically allocated field tx_metadata to
> dynamic one. Because mbufs are used in half-duplex fashion only, it is
> safe
The dynamic mbuf fields were introduced by [1]. The egress metadata is
good candidate to be moved from statically allocated field tx_metadata to
dynamic one. Because mbufs are used in half-duplex fashion only, it is
safe to share this dynamic field with ingress metadata.
The shared dynamic field c
3 matches
Mail list logo
