On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 11:42:24AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
...
> > > Looking at that, at least when MQ is enabled, please don't key
> > > stopping queues off GET_VRING_BASE.
> >
> > Yes, that's only a workaround. I guess it has been there for quite a
> > while, maybe at the time qemu
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 11:17:16AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 03:20:40PM +0900, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote:
> > On 2015/10/26 14:42, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 02:24:08PM +0900, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote:
> > >> On 2015/10/22 21:35, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> >
On 2015/10/26 14:42, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 02:24:08PM +0900, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote:
>> On 2015/10/22 21:35, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> ...
>>> @@ -292,13 +300,13 @@ user_get_vring_base(struct vhost_device_ctx ctx,
>>> * sent and only sent in vhost_vring_stop.
>>> * TODO:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 10:51:14AM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2015-10-27 11:42, Michael S. Tsirkin:
> > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 05:30:41PM +0800, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 11:17:16AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > Looking at that, at least when MQ is enabled,
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 05:30:41PM +0800, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 11:17:16AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 03:20:40PM +0900, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote:
> > > On 2015/10/26 14:42, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 02:24:08PM +0900,
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 03:20:40PM +0900, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote:
> On 2015/10/26 14:42, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 02:24:08PM +0900, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote:
> >> On 2015/10/22 21:35, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> > ...
> >>> @@ -292,13 +300,13 @@ user_get_vring_base(struct vhost_device_ctx
2015-10-27 11:42, Michael S. Tsirkin:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 05:30:41PM +0800, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 11:17:16AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > Looking at that, at least when MQ is enabled, please don't key
> > > stopping queues off GET_VRING_BASE.
> >
> > Yes,
On 10/27/2015 5:56 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 10:51:14AM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>> 2015-10-27 11:42, Michael S. Tsirkin:
>>> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 05:30:41PM +0800, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 11:17:16AM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On 2015/10/22 21:35, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> All queue pairs, including the default (the first) queue pair,
> are allocated dynamically, when a vring_call message is received
> first time for a specific queue pair.
>
> This is a refactor work for enabling vhost-user multiple queue;
> it should not
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 02:24:08PM +0900, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote:
> On 2015/10/22 21:35, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
...
> > @@ -292,13 +300,13 @@ user_get_vring_base(struct vhost_device_ctx ctx,
> > * sent and only sent in vhost_vring_stop.
> > * TODO: cleanup the vring, it isn't usable since
All queue pairs, including the default (the first) queue pair,
are allocated dynamically, when a vring_call message is received
first time for a specific queue pair.
This is a refactor work for enabling vhost-user multiple queue;
it should not break anything as it does no functional changes:
we
11 matches
Mail list logo
