On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 9:34 PM Morten Brørup wrote:
>
> > From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Honnappa
> > Nagarahalli
> > Sent: Monday, 8 November 2021 16.46
> >
> >
> > > >
> > > > > > > > > Current mempool per core cache implementation is
> > > > based
> > > > > > > >
> From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Honnappa
> Nagarahalli
> Sent: Monday, 8 November 2021 16.46
>
>
> > >
> > > > > > > > Current mempool per core cache implementation is
> > > based
> > > > > > > > on
> > > > > > > > pointer
> > > > > > > > For mos
> >
> > > > > > > Current mempool per core cache implementation is
> > based
> > > > > > > on
> > > > > > > pointer
> > > > > > > For most architectures, each pointer consumes 64b
> > > > > > > Replace
> > > > it
> > > > > > > with
> > > > > > > inde
> From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Honnappa
> Nagarahalli
> Sent: Monday, 8 November 2021 16.29
>
>
>
> > > > > > Current mempool per core cache implementation is
> based
> > > > > > on
> > > > > > pointer
> > > > > > For most architectures, each p
> > > > > Current mempool per core cache implementation is based
> > > > > on
> > > > > pointer
> > > > > For most architectures, each pointer consumes 64b
> > > > > Replace
> > it
> > > > > with
> > > > > index-based implementation, where in each b
> From: Honnappa Nagarahalli [mailto:honnappa.nagaraha...@arm.com]
> Sent: Monday, 8 November 2021 05.33
>
>
>
> > > > Current mempool per core cache implementation is based on
> > > > pointer
> > > > For most architectures, each pointer consumes 64b Replace
> it
> > > >
> > > Current mempool per core cache implementation is based on
> > > pointer
> > > For most architectures, each pointer consumes 64b Replace it
> > > with
> > > index-based implementation, where in each buffer is
> > > addressed
> > > by
> > >
+ Ring library maintainers (@Honnappa and @Konstantin) for my rants about its
documentation.
> From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Dharmik Thakkar
> Sent: Thursday, 4 November 2021 05.42
>
> > On Nov 3, 2021, at 10:52 AM, Morten Brørup
> wrote:
> >
> >> From: dev [mailto:dev-bo
> On Nov 3, 2021, at 10:52 AM, Morten Brørup wrote:
>
>> From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Dharmik Thakkar
>> Sent: Wednesday, 3 November 2021 16.13
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Thank you everyone for the comments! I am currently working on making
>> the global pool ring’s implementatio
> From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Dharmik Thakkar
> Sent: Wednesday, 3 November 2021 16.13
>
> Hi,
>
> Thank you everyone for the comments! I am currently working on making
> the global pool ring’s implementation as index based.
> Once done, I will send a patch for community
Hi,
Thank you everyone for the comments! I am currently working on making the
global pool ring’s implementation as index based.
Once done, I will send a patch for community review. I will also make it as a
compile time option.
> On Oct 31, 2021, at 3:14 AM, Morten Brørup wrote:
>
>> From: Mor
> From: Morten Brørup
> Sent: Saturday, 30 October 2021 12.24
>
> > From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Honnappa
> > Nagarahalli
> > Sent: Monday, 4 October 2021 18.36
> >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > > > > Current mempool per core cache implementation is based on
> > pointer
> > > > >
> From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Honnappa
> Nagarahalli
> Sent: Monday, 4 October 2021 18.36
>
>
> >
> >
> > > > > Current mempool per core cache implementation is based on
> pointer
> > > > > For most architectures, each pointer consumes 64b Replace it
> with
> > > > > inde
>
>
> > > > Current mempool per core cache implementation is based on pointer
> > > > For most architectures, each pointer consumes 64b Replace it with
> > > > index-based implementation, where in each buffer is addressed by
> > > > (pool address + index)
> > >
> > > I don't think it is going to
> > > Current mempool per core cache implementation is based on pointer For
> > > most architectures, each pointer consumes 64b Replace it with
> > > index-based implementation, where in each buffer is addressed by (pool
> > > address + index)
> >
> > I don't think it is going to work:
> > On 64-
>
> > Current mempool per core cache implementation is based on pointer For
> > most architectures, each pointer consumes 64b Replace it with
> > index-based implementation, where in each buffer is addressed by (pool
> > address + index)
>
> I don't think it is going to work:
> On 64-bit systems
> Current mempool per core cache implementation is based on pointer
> For most architectures, each pointer consumes 64b
> Replace it with index-based implementation, where in each buffer
> is addressed by (pool address + index)
I don't think it is going to work:
On 64-bit systems difference betwee
On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 11:02 PM Jerin Jacob wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 9:14 PM Honnappa Nagarahalli
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 10:57 PM Dharmik Thakkar
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Current mempool per core cache implementation is based on pointer For
> > > >
> >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 10:57 PM Dharmik Thakkar
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Current mempool per core cache implementation is based on pointer
> > > > For most architectures, each pointer consumes 64b Replace it with
> > > > index-based implementation, where in each buffer is add
On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 9:14 PM Honnappa Nagarahalli
wrote:
>
>
>
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 10:57 PM Dharmik Thakkar
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Current mempool per core cache implementation is based on pointer For
> > > most architectures, each pointer consumes 64b Replace it with
> > > index-b
>
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 10:57 PM Dharmik Thakkar
> wrote:
> >
> > Current mempool per core cache implementation is based on pointer For
> > most architectures, each pointer consumes 64b Replace it with
> > index-based implementation, where in each buffer is addressed by (pool
> > address +
On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 10:57 PM Dharmik Thakkar
wrote:
>
> Current mempool per core cache implementation is based on pointer
> For most architectures, each pointer consumes 64b
> Replace it with index-based implementation, where in each buffer
> is addressed by (pool address + index)
> It will re
Current mempool per core cache implementation is based on pointer
For most architectures, each pointer consumes 64b
Replace it with index-based implementation, where in each buffer
is addressed by (pool address + index)
It will reduce memory requirements
L3Fwd performance testing reveals minor imp
23 matches
Mail list logo
