; Stephen Hemminger; dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] pci: force address of mappings in secondary
process
On 12/07/2017 03:45, Tan, Jianfeng wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio
Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2017 7:36 PM
To: Tan, Jianfeng; Stephen Hemminger; dev at
an, Jianfeng; Stephen Hemminger; dev at dpdk.org
> >> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] pci: force address of mappings in secondary
> >> process
> >>
> >> On 12/07/2017 03:45, Tan, Jianfeng wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> -Original Message-
>
t;>>>> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Stephen
>>>>>> Hemminger
>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2017 9:13 AM
>>>>>> To: dev at dpdk.org
>>>>>> Cc: Stephen Hemminger
>>>&g
> -Original Message-
> From: Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio
> Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2017 3:32 PM
> To: Tan, Jianfeng; Stephen Hemminger; dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] pci: force address of mappings in secondary
> process
>
> On 12/07/2017 03
On 12/07/2017 03:45, Tan, Jianfeng wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio
Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2017 7:36 PM
To: Tan, Jianfeng; Stephen Hemminger; dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] pci: force address of mappings in secondary
process
On 11/07/2017 02:56, Tan
: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: Stephen Hemminger
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] pci: force address of mappings in secondary
process
The PCI memory resources in the secondary process should be in
the exact same location as the primary process. Otherwise
there is a risk of a stray pointer.
Not sure if this is right
> -Original Message-
> From: Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio
> Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2017 7:36 PM
> To: Tan, Jianfeng; Stephen Hemminger; dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] pci: force address of mappings in secondary
> process
>
> On 11/07/2017 02
7 9:13 AM
> >> To: dev@dpdk.org
> >> Cc: Stephen Hemminger
> >> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] pci: force address of mappings in secondary
> >> process
> >>
> >> The PCI memory resources in the secondary process should be in
> >> the exact same
On 11/07/2017 02:56, Tan, Jianfeng wrote:
-Original Message-
From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Stephen
Hemminger
Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2017 9:13 AM
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: Stephen Hemminger
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] pci: force address of mappings in secondary
process
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Stephen
> Hemminger
> Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2017 9:13 AM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Stephen Hemminger
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] pci: force address of mappings in secondary
> process
>
The PCI memory resources in the secondary process should be in
the exact same location as the primary process. Otherwise
there is a risk of a stray pointer.
Not sure if this is right, but it looks like a potential
problem.
---
lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_pci_uio.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1
11 matches
Mail list logo
