On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 4:11 PM Honnappa Nagarahalli
wrote:
> > Yes, please reject it.
> I just tried to mark it rejected in patchwork, I do not have the permissions
> (probably you are the owner of the patch). Can you please mark it?
Indeed, Konstantin should be able to do it.
I just flagged it
> > >
> > > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] ring: make ring implementation non-
> > > inlined
> > > >
> > > > 26/03/2020 09:04, Morten Brørup:
> > > > > From: Jerin Jacob
> > > > > > On Fri, M
>
> > From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Honnappa
> > Nagarahalli
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 1, 2020 1:16 AM
> >
> >
> >
> > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] ring: make ring implementation non-
> > inlined
> > >
&
> From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Honnappa
> Nagarahalli
> Sent: Wednesday, July 1, 2020 1:16 AM
>
>
>
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] ring: make ring implementation non-
> inlined
> >
> > 26/03/2020 09:04, Morten Brørup:
> &g
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] ring: make ring implementation non-inlined
>
> 26/03/2020 09:04, Morten Brørup:
> > From: Jerin Jacob
> > > On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 Konstantin Ananyev wrote:
> > > >
> > > > As was discussed here:
> > > >
26/03/2020 09:04, Morten Brørup:
> From: Jerin Jacob
> > On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 Konstantin Ananyev wrote:
> > >
> > > As was discussed here:
> > > http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2020-February/158586.html
> > > this RFC aimed to hide ring internals into .c and make all
> > > ring functions non-inl
> From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Jerin Jacob
> Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 10:09 PM
>
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 10:11 PM Konstantin Ananyev
> wrote:
> >
> > As was discussed here:
> > http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2020-February/158586.html
> > this RFC aimed to hide
Hi Jerin,
>
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 10:11 PM Konstantin Ananyev
> wrote:
> >
> > As was discussed here:
> > http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2020-February/158586.html
> > this RFC aimed to hide ring internals into .c and make all
> > ring functions non-inlined. In theory that might help to
>
On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 10:11 PM Konstantin Ananyev
wrote:
>
> As was discussed here:
> http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2020-February/158586.html
> this RFC aimed to hide ring internals into .c and make all
> ring functions non-inlined. In theory that might help to
> maintain ABI stability in f
> -Original Message-
> From: Stephen Hemminger
> Sent: Friday, March 20, 2020 5:55 PM
> To: Ananyev, Konstantin
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; olivier.m...@6wind.com; honnappa.nagaraha...@arm.com;
> jer...@marvell.com; d...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
> Subject: Re: [RFC] ring: make ring implementation n
On Fri, 20 Mar 2020 16:41:38 +
Konstantin Ananyev wrote:
> As was discussed here:
> http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2020-February/158586.html
> this RFC aimed to hide ring internals into .c and make all
> ring functions non-inlined. In theory that might help to
> maintain ABI stability in
As was discussed here:
http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2020-February/158586.html
this RFC aimed to hide ring internals into .c and make all
ring functions non-inlined. In theory that might help to
maintain ABI stability in future.
This is just a POC to measure the impact of proposed idea,
proper
12 matches
Mail list logo
