>
> Hi everyone,
Thanks Konstantin for the review.
>
> >
> >
> > > >
> > > > > > Subject: [RFC 3/5] eal: lcore state FINISHED is not required
> > > > > >
> > > > > > FINISHED state seems to be used to indicate that the worker's
> > > > > > update of the 'state' is not visible to other threads
Hi everyone,
>
>
> > >
> > > > > Subject: [RFC 3/5] eal: lcore state FINISHED is not required
> > > > >
> > > > > FINISHED state seems to be used to indicate that the worker's
> > > > > update of the 'state' is not visible to other threads. There seems
> > > > > to be no requirement to have su
> >
> > > > Subject: [RFC 3/5] eal: lcore state FINISHED is not required
> > > >
> > > > FINISHED state seems to be used to indicate that the worker's
> > > > update of the 'state' is not visible to other threads. There seems
> > > > to be no requirement to have such a state.
> > >
> > > I am not
26/02/2021 00:33, Honnappa Nagarahalli:
> +Thomas, David, Konstantin for input
>
>
>
> > > Subject: [RFC 3/5] eal: lcore state FINISHED is not required
> > >
> > > FINISHED state seems to be used to indicate that the worker's update
> > > of the 'state' is not visible to other threads. There see
+Thomas, David, Konstantin for input
> > Subject: [RFC 3/5] eal: lcore state FINISHED is not required
> >
> > FINISHED state seems to be used to indicate that the worker's update
> > of the 'state' is not visible to other threads. There seems to be no
> > requirement to have such a state.
>
> I
FINISHED state seems to be used to indicate that the worker's update
of the 'state' is not visible to other threads. There seems to be no
requirement to have such a state.
Signed-off-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli
Reviewed-by: Ola Liljedahl
---
drivers/event/dpaa2/dpaa2_eventdev_selftest.c | 2 +-
dr
6 matches
Mail list logo
