[dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCHv2 0/2] pktdev as wrapper type

2015-05-21 Thread Richardson, Bruce
> -Original Message- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Neil Horman > Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2015 7:47 PM > To: Marc Sune > Cc: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCHv2 0/2] pktdev as wrapper type > > On Wed, May 20, 2015 a

[dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCHv2 0/2] pktdev as wrapper type

2015-05-20 Thread Marc Sune
On 20/05/15 12:28, Neil Horman wrote: > On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 12:05:00PM +0200, Marc Sune wrote: >> >> On 20/05/15 10:31, Thomas Monjalon wrote: >>> 2015-05-19 12:31, Bruce Richardson: On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 05:29:39PM +0100, Bruce Richardson wrote: > Hi all, > > after a

[dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCHv2 0/2] pktdev as wrapper type

2015-05-20 Thread Neil Horman
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 07:01:02PM +0200, Marc Sune wrote: > > > On 20/05/15 12:28, Neil Horman wrote: > >On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 12:05:00PM +0200, Marc Sune wrote: > >> > >>On 20/05/15 10:31, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > >>>2015-05-19 12:31, Bruce Richardson: > On Mon, May 11, 2015 at

[dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCHv2 0/2] pktdev as wrapper type

2015-05-20 Thread Marc Sune
On 20/05/15 10:31, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 2015-05-19 12:31, Bruce Richardson: >> On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 05:29:39PM +0100, Bruce Richardson wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> after a small amount of offline discussion with Marc Sune, here is an >>> alternative proposal for a higher-level interface -

[dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCHv2 0/2] pktdev as wrapper type

2015-05-20 Thread Thomas Monjalon
2015-05-19 12:31, Bruce Richardson: > On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 05:29:39PM +0100, Bruce Richardson wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > after a small amount of offline discussion with Marc Sune, here is an > > alternative proposal for a higher-level interface - aka pktdev - to allow a > > common Rx/Tx API

[dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCHv2 0/2] pktdev as wrapper type

2015-05-20 Thread Neil Horman
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 12:05:00PM +0200, Marc Sune wrote: > > > On 20/05/15 10:31, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > >2015-05-19 12:31, Bruce Richardson: > >>On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 05:29:39PM +0100, Bruce Richardson wrote: > >>>Hi all, > >>> > >>>after a small amount of offline discussion with Marc

[dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCHv2 0/2] pktdev as wrapper type

2015-05-20 Thread Wiles, Keith
It looks fine to me. On 5/19/15, 7:31 AM, "Richardson, Bruce" wrote: >On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 05:29:39PM +0100, Bruce Richardson wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> after a small amount of offline discussion with Marc Sune, here is an >> alternative proposal for a higher-level interface - aka pktdev - to

[dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCHv2 0/2] pktdev as wrapper type

2015-05-19 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 05:29:39PM +0100, Bruce Richardson wrote: > Hi all, > > after a small amount of offline discussion with Marc Sune, here is an > alternative proposal for a higher-level interface - aka pktdev - to allow a > common Rx/Tx API across device types handling mbufs [for now,

[dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCHv2 0/2] pktdev as wrapper type

2015-05-11 Thread Bruce Richardson
Hi all, after a small amount of offline discussion with Marc Sune, here is an alternative proposal for a higher-level interface - aka pktdev - to allow a common Rx/Tx API across device types handling mbufs [for now, ethdev, ring and KNI]. The key code is in the first patch fo the set - the second