On 30 Jan 2020, at 21:20, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
Yes, sorry, this is what I meant.
Given 19.11.0 already has the symbol as experimental,
and that applications like OVS had to accept it as experimental,
why removing experimental tag in 19.11.1?
I think it was mentioned that it was preferr
On 1/30/2020 12:33 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I disagree with the need of this patch.
> The symbol was experimental, meaning we can change it.
> Removing experimental tag is not an ABI break.
In theory what you said is correct, this is experimental API and anything can
happen to it, thi
30/01/2020 17:15, Eelco Chaudron:
> On 30 Jan 2020, at 17:04, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > On Thu, 2020-01-30 at 16:55 +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> >> 30/01/2020 15:21, Luca Boccassi:
> >>> On Thu, 2020-01-30 at 15:17 +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 30/01/2020 13:57, Luca Boccassi:
> > On T
On 30 Jan 2020, at 17:04, Luca Boccassi wrote:
On Thu, 2020-01-30 at 16:55 +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
30/01/2020 15:21, Luca Boccassi:
On Thu, 2020-01-30 at 15:17 +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
30/01/2020 13:57, Luca Boccassi:
On Thu, 2020-01-30 at 13:33 +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
H
On Thu, 2020-01-30 at 16:55 +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 30/01/2020 15:21, Luca Boccassi:
> > On Thu, 2020-01-30 at 15:17 +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > 30/01/2020 13:57, Luca Boccassi:
> > > > On Thu, 2020-01-30 at 13:33 +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > I di
30/01/2020 15:21, Luca Boccassi:
> On Thu, 2020-01-30 at 15:17 +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 30/01/2020 13:57, Luca Boccassi:
> > > On Thu, 2020-01-30 at 13:33 +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I disagree with the need of this patch.
> > > > The symbol was experimental,
On Thu, 2020-01-30 at 15:17 +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 30/01/2020 13:57, Luca Boccassi:
> > On Thu, 2020-01-30 at 13:33 +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I disagree with the need of this patch.
> > > The symbol was experimental, meaning we can change it.
> > > Removing exper
30/01/2020 13:57, Luca Boccassi:
> On Thu, 2020-01-30 at 13:33 +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I disagree with the need of this patch.
> > The symbol was experimental, meaning we can change it.
> > Removing experimental tag is not an ABI break.
>
> Hi,
>
> This symbol change was re
On Thu, 2020-01-30 at 13:33 +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I disagree with the need of this patch.
> The symbol was experimental, meaning we can change it.
> Removing experimental tag is not an ABI break.
Hi,
This symbol change was requested for backport in 19.11.x, and
experimental or
Hi,
I disagree with the need of this patch.
The symbol was experimental, meaning we can change it.
Removing experimental tag is not an ABI break.
29/01/2020 17:43, Ferruh Yigit:
> Duplicated the existing symbol and versioned one as experimental and
> other as stable.
[..]
> --- a/lib/librte_mete
On 1/29/20 5:43 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
[...]
> diff --git a/lib/librte_meter/rte_meter.c b/lib/librte_meter/rte_meter.c
> index da01429a8..5244537fa 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_meter/rte_meter.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_meter/rte_meter.c
> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
> #include
> #include
> #include
> +#include
Duplicated the existing symbol and versioned one as experimental and
other as stable.
Created VERSION_SYMBOL_EXPERIMENTAL helper macro.
Updated the 'check-experimental-syms.sh' buildtool, which was
complaining that the symbol is in EXPERIMENTAL tag in .map file but it
is not in the .experimental
12 matches
Mail list logo
