Re: [dpdk-dev] [disscussion] mlx4 driver MLX4_PMD_TX_MP_CACHE default vaule

2017-07-28 Thread Adrien Mazarguil
Hi Changhu, On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 10:52:45AM +, chenchanghu wrote: > Hi Adrien, > Thanks very much! I have got the question about MLX4_PMD_TX_MP_CACHE value, > we will modify this value to suit our applications. > However, in the 2 clients or more clients test, we found that the functi

Re: [dpdk-dev] [disscussion] mlx4 driver MLX4_PMD_TX_MP_CACHE default vaule

2017-07-28 Thread chenchanghu
Hi Adrien, Thanks very much! I have got the question about MLX4_PMD_TX_MP_CACHE value, we will modify this value to suit our applications. However, in the 2 clients or more clients test, we found that the function 'txq->if_qp->send_pending' and 'txq->if_qp->send_flush(txq->qp)' in 'mlx4_tx

Re: [dpdk-dev] [disscussion] mlx4 driver MLX4_PMD_TX_MP_CACHE default vaule

2017-07-28 Thread Adrien Mazarguil
Hi, On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 07:58:48AM +, chenchanghu wrote: > Hi, > When I used the mlx4 pmd, I meet a problem about > MLX4_PMD_TX_MP_CACHE vaule, which is used for Memory pool to Memory region > translation. The detail test is descripted below. > 1.Test environmemt infomation: >

[dpdk-dev] [disscussion] mlx4 driver MLX4_PMD_TX_MP_CACHE default vaule

2017-07-28 Thread chenchanghu
Hi, When I used the mlx4 pmd, I meet a problem about MLX4_PMD_TX_MP_CACHE vaule, which is used for Memory pool to Memory region translation. The detail test is descripted below. 1.Test environmemt infomation: a. Linux distribution: CentOS b. dpdk version: dpdk-16.04 c. Ethernet dev