Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2 2/2] net/e1000: fix defects of macro in VF

2020-05-18 Thread Zhao1, Wei
> -Original Message- > From: Ye, Xiaolong > Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2020 7:39 AM > To: Zhao1, Wei > Cc: Sun, GuinanX ; dev@dpdk.org; sta...@dpdk.org; > Min, JiaqiX ; Yigit, Ferruh > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2 2/2] net/e1000: fix defects of

Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2 2/2] net/e1000: fix defects of macro in VF

2020-05-18 Thread Ye Xiaolong
Hi, wei On 05/18, Zhao1, Wei wrote: >Hi, xiaolong > >> -Original Message- >> From: dev On Behalf Of Ye Xiaolong >> Sent: Monday, May 18, 2020 9:25 AM >> To: Sun, GuinanX >> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; sta...@dpdk.org >> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-sta

Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2 2/2] net/e1000: fix defects of macro in VF

2020-05-17 Thread Zhao1, Wei
Hi, xiaolong > -Original Message- > From: dev On Behalf Of Ye Xiaolong > Sent: Monday, May 18, 2020 9:25 AM > To: Sun, GuinanX > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; sta...@dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2 2/2] net/e1000: fix defects of > macro in VF > &g

Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2 2/2] net/e1000: fix defects of macro in VF

2020-05-17 Thread Ye Xiaolong
Hi, guinan On 05/08, Guinan Sun wrote: >The defects in the macros UPDATE_VF_STAT and UPDATE_VF_STAT_36BIT exist. >If latest is less than last, we will get wrong result. >The patch fixes the defect. There was similar patch before, https://patches.dpdk.org/patch/65131/, if I understand it correctly