emant Agrawal ; Ian Stokes
; Jerin Jacob ; John McNamara
; Luca Boccassi ; Pei Zhang
; pingx...@intel.com; qian.q...@intel.com; Raslan Darawsheh
; Thomas Monjalon ;
yuan.p...@intel.com; zhaoyan.c...@intel.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] 18.11.3 (LTS) patches review and test
On 15/10/
637067598538520498&sdata=X9m0UCbuquZtc7h22q0G8o82W9wYNMU1wT4n%2F1i1cnI%3D&reserved=0'
> and Azure image: 'SUSE SLES 15 latest':
>
> * PERF-DPDK-MULTICORE-PPS-F32: FAILED
>
>
> Regards,
> Abhishek
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: K
On 15/10/2019 18:19, Kevin Traynor wrote:
> On 15/10/2019 18:12, Abhishek Marathe wrote:
>> Hi Kevin,
>>
>> We tried reverting all netvsc and failsafe patches, still we got the same
>> results. We are still looking into it.
>> "PERF-DPDK-MULTICORE-PPS-F32" testcase failed because of performance is
ni ;
>> benjamin.wal...@intel.com; David Christensen ;
>> Hemant Agrawal ; Ian Stokes
>> ; Jerin Jacob ; John McNamara
>> ; Luca Boccassi ; Pei Zhang
>> ; pingx...@intel.com; qian.q...@intel.com; Raslan
>> Darawsheh ; Thomas Monjalon
>> ; yuan.p...@intel.com;
homas Monjalon
> ; yuan.p...@intel.com; zhaoyan.c...@intel.com
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] 18.11.3 (LTS) patches review and test
>
> Azure image: 'Canonical UbuntuServer 18.04-DAILY-LTS latest':
> >
> > * PERF-DPDK-SINGLE-CORE-PPS-DS4: FAILED
> >
Azure image: 'Canonical UbuntuServer 18.04-DAILY-LTS latest':
>
> * PERF-DPDK-SINGLE-CORE-PPS-DS4: FAILED
> * VERIFY-DPDK-OVS: PASSED
> * VERIFY-DPDK-BUILD-AND-TESTPMD-TEST: PASSED
> * VERIFY-SRIOV-FAILSAFE-FOR-DPDK: PASSED
> * PERF-DPDK-MULTICORE-PPS-F32: FAILED
Hi Abhishek,
since you use the dai
Hi Kevin,
We tried reverting all netvsc and failsafe patches, still we got the same
results. We are still looking into it.
"PERF-DPDK-MULTICORE-PPS-F32" testcase failed because of performance is lower
than threshold.
Following performance is observed in distros other than Ubuntu and RHEL 7
(bec
On 15/10/2019 18:12, Abhishek Marathe wrote:
> Hi Kevin,
>
> We tried reverting all netvsc and failsafe patches, still we got the same
> results. We are still looking into it.
> "PERF-DPDK-MULTICORE-PPS-F32" testcase failed because of performance is lower
> than threshold.
> Following performanc
On 11/10/2019 22:19, Kevin Traynor wrote:
> On 11/10/2019 17:33, Ju-Hyoung Lee wrote:
>> Is there any other partners have done DPDK performance test with different
>> OS distro?
>
> There was a few other perf testings reported elsewhere in reply to this
> thread and there wasn't other perf drop r
9 matches
Mail list logo
