-dev at lists.fd.io>>; Zhang,
> Helin mailto:helin.zhang at intel.com>>;
> dev at dpdk.org<mailto:dev at dpdk.org>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [vpp-dev] VLAN packets dropped... ?
>
> Hi Konstantin,
>
> Thanks for the link to DPDK discussion wrt this VLAN offload flag
11:11 AM
> > To: Ananyev, Konstantin ; Wiles, Keith
> > ; Chandrasekar Kannan
> > Cc: vpp-dev ; Zhang, Helin > intel.com>;
> > dev at dpdk.org
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [vpp-dev] VLAN packets dropped... ?
> >
> > Hi Konstantin,
> >
&g
ket in SW.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of John Lo (loj)
> > Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2016 11:11 AM
> > To: Ananyev, Konstantin ; Wiles, Keith
> > ; Chandrasekar Kannan
> > Cc: vpp-dev ; Zhang, Helin &
ang, Helin ;
> dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [vpp-dev] VLAN packets dropped... ?
>
> Hi Konstantin,
>
> Thanks for the link to DPDK discussion wrt this VLAN offload flag
> PKT_RX_VLAN_PKT. It seems the proposal was to deprecate
> PKT_RX_VLAN_PKT and in
Hi Konstantin,
Thanks for the link to DPDK discussion wrt this VLAN offload flag
PKT_RX_VLAN_PKT. It seems the proposal was to deprecate PKT_RX_VLAN_PKT and
introduce two new flags PKT_RX_VLAN_STRIPPED and PKT_RX_QINQ_STRIPPED.
It would be a really good idea to keep PKT_RX_VLAN_PKT to
> I suppose this has to do with what is expected usage of the PKT_RX_VLAN_PKT
> offload flag. Is it set only for VLAN packets with the
> VLAN stripped or should always be set if VLAN is/was present in the received
> packet. It seems that different DPDK drivers are
> behaving differently which
6 matches
Mail list logo
