> -Original Message-
> From: Bly, Mike [mailto:m...@ciena.com]
> Sent: Friday, June 29, 2018 9:01 PM
> To: Dumitrescu, Cristian ; Yeddula, Avinash
> ; dev@dpdk.org; dev ;
> us...@dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: 17.05 --> 17.11, minimum hash table key size
>
> Cristian,
>
> Thank you. I have don
Hello,
We are in process of migrating our design from DPDK 17.05 to 17.11 and we ran
into a small problem. Within our design, we have some hash tables with 4-byte
keys. While going through the changes done in 17.11, we have found there was an
added key_size check, which now requires key_size >=
essage-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Yeddula, Avinash
> Sent: Friday, June 29, 2018 1:11 AM
> To: dev@dpdk.org; dev ; us...@dpdk.org
> Cc: Bly, Mike
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] 17.05 --> 17.11, minimum hash table key size
>
> Hello,
>
> We are in proce
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Yeddula, Avinash
> Sent: Friday, June 29, 2018 1:11 AM
> To: dev@dpdk.org; dev ; us...@dpdk.org
> Cc: Bly, Mike
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] 17.05 --> 17.11, minimum hash table key size
>
Hello,
We are in process of migrating our design from DPDK 17.05 to 17.11 and we ran
into a small problem. Within our design, we have some hash tables with 4-byte
keys. While going through the changes done in 17.11, we have found there was an
added key_size check, which now requires key_size >=
5 matches
Mail list logo
