On 11/10/2019 17:33, Ju-Hyoung Lee wrote:
> Is there any other partners have done DPDK performance test with different OS
> distro?
There was a few other perf testings reported elsewhere in reply to this
thread and there wasn't other perf drop reported. I only know the distro
of the Red Hat testi
+Christian from Canonical for the Ubuntu on Azure performance issue
On Fri, 2019-10-11 at 16:33 +, Ju-Hyoung Lee wrote:
> Is there any other partners have done DPDK performance test with
> different OS distro?
> I wonder if this is distro-specific or Azure-specific.
>
> Ju
>
> -Original
Is there any other partners have done DPDK performance test with different OS
distro?
I wonder if this is distro-specific or Azure-specific.
Ju
-Original Message-
From: Abhishek Marathe
Sent: Friday, October 11, 2019 9:30 AM
To: Kevin Traynor ; sta...@dpdk.org
Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Akhil G
On 10/10/2019 19:39, Stokes, Ian wrote:
>
>
> On 9/13/2019 5:31 PM, Kevin Traynor wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Here is a list of patches targeted for LTS release 18.11.3.
>>
>> The planned date for the final release is 9th October.
>>
>> Please help with testing and validation of your use cases and re
On 08/10/2019 11:22, Yu, PingX wrote:
> Kevin,
> FYI. All build are passed in 18.11.3-RC2 except Win10 no support. No issues
> are found now.
>
Great, thanks for confirming Ping.
Kevin.
> Regards,
> Yu Ping
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Kevin Traynor [mailto:ktray...@redhat.com]
> S
On 07/10/2019 21:01, Thinh Tran wrote:
> Hi-
>
> IBM - DPDK on Power result
>
> *Basic PF on Mallanox: No new errors or regressions were seen.
> *Performance: no degradation compared to 18.11.2
>
> System tested:
> - IBM Power9 Model 8335-101 CPU: 2.3 (pvr 004e 1203)
> Tested NICs:
> - Mella
On 9/13/2019 5:31 PM, Kevin Traynor wrote:
Hi all,
Here is a list of patches targeted for LTS release 18.11.3.
The planned date for the final release is 9th October.
Please help with testing and validation of your use cases and report
any issues/results in reply to this mail. For the final
Kevin,
FYI. All build are passed in 18.11.3-RC2 except Win10 no support. No issues are
found now.
Regards,
Yu Ping
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Traynor [mailto:ktray...@redhat.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 3, 2019 9:30 PM
To: Yu, PingX ; sta...@dpdk.org; dev@dpdk.org
Cc: Akhil Goyal ;
; Ju-Hyoung Lee ; Luca Boccassi
; Pei Zhang ; pingx...@intel.com;
qian.q...@intel.com; Raslan Darawsheh ; Thomas Monjalon
; yuan.p...@intel.com; zhaoyan.c...@intel.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] 18.11.3 (LTS) patches review and test
Hi-
IBM - DPDK on Power result
*Basic PF on Mallanox: No new
Hi-
IBM - DPDK on Power result
*Basic PF on Mallanox: No new errors or regressions were seen.
*Performance: no degradation compared to 18.11.2
System tested:
- IBM Power9 Model 8335-101 CPU: 2.3 (pvr 004e 1203)
Tested NICs:
- Mellanox Technologies MT28800 Family [ConnectX-5 Ex]
- firmware ve
On 04/10/2019 03:28, Pei Zhang wrote:
> Hi Kevin,
>
> The testings from Red Hat get PASS result. Below 13 testing scenarios look
> good with v18.11.3-rc1.
>
>
> Testing scenarios:
> (1)Guest with device assignment(PF) throughput testing(1G hugepage size): PASS
> (2)Guest with device assignment(
Hi Kevin,
The testings from Red Hat get PASS result. Below 13 testing scenarios look good
with v18.11.3-rc1.
Testing scenarios:
(1)Guest with device assignment(PF) throughput testing(1G hugepage size): PASS
(2)Guest with device assignment(PF) throughput testing(2M hugepage size): PASS
(3)Guest
On 26/09/2019 08:41, Yu, PingX wrote:
> Kevin,
> FYi.
>> 2. [dpdk-stable 18.11.3] meson build error on ub1604-i86
> Q1: What are the error logs?
> Please see below Error info.
>
> Q2: Is it a regression for you? i.e. did this test pass with 18.11.2?
> No, it isn't a regression. We don't test it
Hi all,
Here is a list of patches targeted for LTS release 18.11.3.
The planned date for the final release is 14th October.
Please note the commits since RC1 below. They are primarily to
address some build issues for 32-bit with meson and FreeBSD.
As such, I would expect that most RC1 testing i
Kevin,
FYi.
> 2. [dpdk-stable 18.11.3] meson build error on ub1604-i86
Q1: What are the error logs?
Please see below Error info.
Q2: Is it a regression for you? i.e. did this test pass with 18.11.2?
No, it isn't a regression. We don't test it on 18.11.1 and 18.11.2 before,
another the test res
On 19/09/2019 11:22, Yu, PingX wrote:
> Hi all,
> Update Intel test result here.
>
Hi Yu Ping,
Thanks for testing. Some comments/questions on the failures,
> # Basic Intel(R) NIC testing
> * PF(i40e): Pass
> * PF(ixgbe): Pass
> * VF: Pass
> * Build or compile: 3 bugs are found.
> 1. [dpdk-st
On 19/09/2019 23:44, Abhishek Marathe wrote:
> Hi All,
>
Hi Abhishek, thanks for testing, some comments below.
> While testing 18.11.3-rc1 on Azure we faced following problems:
>
> 1. VERIFY-DPDK-OVS - This test case builds OVS (OpenVSwitch) with DPDK
> support on Ubuntu distro (16.04 and 18.
Hi All,
While testing 18.11.3-rc1 on Azure we faced following problems:
1. VERIFY-DPDK-OVS - This test case builds OVS (OpenVSwitch) with DPDK support
on Ubuntu distro (16.04 and 18.04) and tests if the OVS DPDK ports can be
created. This testcase aborted, after diagnosis we found out that ins
+ @Abhishek Marathe
-Original Message-
From: Yu, PingX
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2019 3:22 AM
To: Kevin Traynor ; sta...@dpdk.org; dev@dpdk.org
Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Akhil Goyal ; Ali Alnubani
; Walker, Benjamin ; David
Christensen ; Hemant Agrawal ;
Stokes, Ian ; Jerin Jacob ; Mcnama
Hi all,
Update Intel test result here.
# Basic Intel(R) NIC testing
* PF(i40e): Pass
* PF(ixgbe): Pass
* VF: Pass
* Build or compile: 3 bugs are found.
1. [dpdk-stable 18.11.3] compile error on freebsd12
2. [dpdk-stable 18.11.3] meson build error on ub1604-i86
3. [dpdk-stable 18.11.3] confi
Hi all,
Here is a list of patches targeted for LTS release 18.11.3.
The planned date for the final release is 9th October.
Please help with testing and validation of your use cases and report
any issues/results in reply to this mail. For the final release the
fixes and reported validations will
21 matches
Mail list logo
