Re: [dpdk-dev] 19.11.1 patches review and test

2020-03-12 Thread Luca Boccassi
On Thu, 2020-03-12 at 10:16 -0500, Thinh Tran wrote: > Hi - > IBM - DPDK on Power test result for v19.11.1-rc1 > > *Basic PF on Mallanox: No new errors or regressions were seen. > * Single port stability test using l3fwd (16 cpus) and TRex, tested > 64 >and 1500 byte packets at a 0.0% drop rat

Re: [dpdk-dev] 19.11.1 patches review and test

2020-03-12 Thread Thinh Tran
Hi - IBM - DPDK on Power test result for v19.11.1-rc1 *Basic PF on Mallanox: No new errors or regressions were seen. * Single port stability test using l3fwd (16 cpus) and TRex, tested 64 and 1500 byte packets at a 0.0% drop rate for 4 hours each. *Performance: no degradation compared to 19.11.

Re: [dpdk-dev] 19.11.1 patches review and test

2020-03-11 Thread Luca Boccassi
On Wed, 2020-03-11 at 08:58 +0530, Kalesh Anakkur Purayil wrote: > Hi Luca, > > Testing with dpdk v19.11.1-rc1 from Broadcom looks good. > > - Basic functionality: > Send and receive multiple types of traffic. > - Changing/checking link status through testpmd. > - RSS tests. > - TSO tests > - V

Re: [dpdk-dev] 19.11.1 patches review and test

2020-03-10 Thread Kalesh Anakkur Purayil
Hi Luca, Testing with dpdk v19.11.1-rc1 from Broadcom looks good. - Basic functionality: Send and receive multiple types of traffic. - Changing/checking link status through testpmd. - RSS tests. - TSO tests - VLAN filtering tests. - statistics tests - Checksum offload - MTU tests NIC: BCM57414

Re: [dpdk-dev] 19.11.1 patches review and test

2020-03-10 Thread Luca Boccassi
On Tue, 2020-03-10 at 13:26 +, Ali Alnubani wrote: > Hi Luca, > > > -Original Message- > > From: > > luca.bocca...@gmail.com > > < > > luca.bocca...@gmail.com > > > > > Sent: Monday, March 2, 2020 1:11 PM > > To: > > sta...@dpdk.org > > > > Cc: > > dev@dpdk.org > > ; Abhishek Mara

Re: [dpdk-dev] 19.11.1 patches review and test

2020-03-10 Thread Ali Alnubani
Hi Luca, > -Original Message- > From: luca.bocca...@gmail.com > Sent: Monday, March 2, 2020 1:11 PM > To: sta...@dpdk.org > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Abhishek Marathe ; > Akhil Goyal ; Ali Alnubani ; > benjamin.wal...@intel.com; David Christensen ; > Hemant Agrawal ; Ian Stokes > ; Jerin Jacob ;

Re: [dpdk-dev] 19.11.1 patches review and test

2020-03-10 Thread Luca Boccassi
On Tue, 2020-03-10 at 10:13 +, Yu, PingX wrote: > Luca, > Update the test result of Intel part, all passed. > > * Intel(R) Testing > > # Basic Intel(R) NIC testing > * PF(i40e): Passed > * PF(ixgbe): Passed > * PF(ice): Passed > * VF: Passed > * Build or compile: Passed > * Intel NIC single

Re: [dpdk-dev] 19.11.1 patches review and test

2020-03-10 Thread Yu, PingX
Luca, Update the test result of Intel part, all passed. * Intel(R) Testing # Basic Intel(R) NIC testing * PF(i40e): Passed * PF(ixgbe): Passed * PF(ice): Passed * VF: Passed * Build or compile: Passed * Intel NIC single core/NIC performance: Passed #Basic cryptodev and virtio testing * vhost/v

Re: [dpdk-dev] 19.11.1 patches review and test

2020-03-06 Thread Luca Boccassi
On Fri, 2020-03-06 at 01:55 -0500, Pei Zhang wrote: > Hi Luca, > > Testing with dpdk v19.11.1-rc1 from Red Hat looks good. > > We cover below 13 scenarios and and all get PASS on RHEL8 testing: > > (1)Guest with device assignment(PF) throughput testing(1G hugepage > size): PASS > (2)Guest with

Re: [dpdk-dev] 19.11.1 patches review and test

2020-03-05 Thread Pei Zhang
Hi Luca, Testing with dpdk v19.11.1-rc1 from Red Hat looks good. We cover below 13 scenarios and and all get PASS on RHEL8 testing: (1)Guest with device assignment(PF) throughput testing(1G hugepage size): PASS (2)Guest with device assignment(PF) throughput testing(2M hugepage size) : PASS (3)

[dpdk-dev] 19.11.1 patches review and test

2020-03-02 Thread luca . boccassi
Hi all, Here is a list of patches targeted for stable release 19.11.1. The planned date for the final release is March the 16th. Please help with testing and validation of your use cases and report any issues/results with reply-all to this mail. For the final release the fixes and reported valid