On 3/22/2016 6:20 PM, Richardson, Bruce wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 05:50:28AM +, Qiu, Michael wrote:
>> On 3/21/2016 11:27 PM, Kyle Larose wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 10:52 AM, Bruce Richardson
>>> wrote:
On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 08:18:57PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 10:17:21AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 07:19:01 -0500
> Jay Rolette wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 5:19 AM, Bruce Richardson <
> > bruce.richardson at intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 05:50:28AM +, Qiu, Michael
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 05:50:28AM +, Qiu, Michael wrote:
> On 3/21/2016 11:27 PM, Kyle Larose wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 10:52 AM, Bruce Richardson
> > wrote:
> >> On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 08:18:57PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> >>> 2016-03-20 14:17, Zhang, Helin:
> From:
On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 07:19:01 -0500
Jay Rolette wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 5:19 AM, Bruce Richardson <
> bruce.richardson at intel.com> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 05:50:28AM +, Qiu, Michael wrote:
> > >
> > > Why not to implement one simple API with variable arguments, just
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 5:19 AM, Bruce Richardson <
bruce.richardson at intel.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 05:50:28AM +, Qiu, Michael wrote:
> >
> > Why not to implement one simple API with variable arguments, just like
> > syscall ioctl() does. And drivers implement it's specific
On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 08:18:57PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2016-03-20 14:17, Zhang, Helin:
> > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com]
> > > 2016-03-18 10:16, Stephen Hemminger:
> > > > Right now, all those offload features are pretty much unusable in a
> > > > real
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 10:52 AM, Bruce Richardson
wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 08:18:57PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>> 2016-03-20 14:17, Zhang, Helin:
>> > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com]
>> > > 2016-03-18 10:16, Stephen Hemminger:
>> > > > Right now, all
2016-03-20 14:17, Zhang, Helin:
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com]
> > 2016-03-18 10:16, Stephen Hemminger:
> > > Right now, all those offload features are pretty much unusable in a
> > > real product without lots and lots of extra codes and huge bug
> > > surface. It
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com]
> Sent: Saturday, March 19, 2016 2:01 AM
> To: Stephen Hemminger
> Cc: Zhang, Helin ; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: DPDK and HW offloads
>
> 2016-03-18 10:16, Stephen Hemminger:
> > As I look at how the
2016-03-18 10:16, Stephen Hemminger:
> As I look at how the ethernet device interface in DPDK has exploded in
> complexity;
Yes I would like to start addressing this complexity in 16.07.
> it makes life very hard for end users. The goal has been to enable all the
> cool hardware
> features,
As I look at how the ethernet device interface in DPDK has exploded in
complexity;
it makes life very hard for end users. The goal has been to enable all the
cool hardware
features, but it has put blinders on the driver devlopers; they are ignoring
the fact
that real applications can't just
11 matches
Mail list logo