have plan to
support MP/MC in kernel part of KNI as well?
From: Robert Sanford [mailto:rsanfo...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2014 4:49 AM
To: Zhou, Danny; dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Enhance KNI DPDK-app-side to be Multi-Producer/Consumer
Hi Danny,
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at
Hi Danny,
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 7:04 PM, Zhou, Danny wrote:
> It will be always good if you can submit the RFC patch in terms of KNI
> optimization.
>
> On the other hand, do you have any perf. data to prove that your patchset
> could improve
> KNI performance which is the concern that most cu
On 14/11/14 22:05, Sanford, Robert wrote:
> Hello Thomas,
>
> I want to discuss a small enhancement to KNI that we developed. We wanted
> to send/receive mbufs between one KNI device and multiple cores, but we
> wanted to keep the changes simple. So, here were our requirements:
>
> 1. Don't use hea
Robert
> Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2014 5:06 AM
> To: Thomas Monjalon; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] Enhance KNI DPDK-app-side to be Multi-Producer/Consumer
>
> Hello Thomas,
>
> I want to discuss a small enhancement to KNI that we developed. We wanted
> to send/receiv
Hello Thomas,
I want to discuss a small enhancement to KNI that we developed. We wanted
to send/receive mbufs between one KNI device and multiple cores, but we
wanted to keep the changes simple. So, here were our requirements:
1. Don't use heavy synchronization when reading/writing the FIFOs in
s
5 matches
Mail list logo
