[dpdk-dev] Fwd: [PATCH] PPC: Fix NUMA node numbering on IBM POWER8 LE machine

David, Let me take a look. On 2015/9/16 16:09, David Marchand wrote: > Hello Chao, > > On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 4:02 AM, Chao Zhu > wrote: > > Actually, without this change, DPDK can't work properly on PPC64 > little endian platform. It'll report

[dpdk-dev] Fwd: [PATCH] PPC: Fix NUMA node numbering on IBM POWER8 LE machine

Hello Chao, On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 4:02 AM, Chao Zhu wrote: > Actually, without this change, DPDK can't work properly on PPC64 little > endian platform. It'll report "EAL: Not enough memory available! Requested: > xxxMB, available: xxxMB" such kind of error. But for users, they don't know >

[dpdk-dev] Fwd: [PATCH] PPC: Fix NUMA node numbering on IBM POWER8 LE machine

Actually, without this change, DPDK can't work properly on PPC64 little endian platform. It'll report "EAL: Not enough memory available! Requested: xxxMB, available: xxxMB" such kind of error. But for users, they don't know that changing the value of CONFIG_RTE_MAX_NUMA_NODES can fix this.

[dpdk-dev] Fwd: [PATCH] PPC: Fix NUMA node numbering on IBM POWER8 LE machine

Any response of this patch? Forwarded Message Subject:[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] PPC: Fix NUMA node numbering on IBM POWER8 LE machine Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2015 20:19:48 +0800 From: Chao Zhu To: dev at dpdk.org When Linux is running on bare

[dpdk-dev] Fwd: [PATCH] PPC: Fix NUMA node numbering on IBM POWER8 LE machine

On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 03:46:49PM +0800, Chao Zhu wrote: > > Any response of this patch? Looks ok to me - pretty trivial change. /Bruce > > Forwarded Message > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] PPC: Fix NUMA node numbering on IBM POWER8 LE > machine > Date: Fri, 14