Hi,
Kathleen has submitted an RFC patch [1] in this regard. We’d appreciate your
comments.
[1]
https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20210430213747.41530-2-kathleen.cape...@arm.com/
Thank you!
> On Apr 30, 2021, at 4:28 AM, Ananyev, Konstantin
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 29, 2021
>
> On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 11:47:30AM +, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
>
> > >
> > > It looks as if implementing em_mask_key() is enough to get l3fwd
> > > working. However to me this ifdef seems tricky. How should a scalar
> > > implementation handle the xmm_t type? rte_xmm_t looks like an A
On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 11:47:30AM +, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
> >
> > It looks as if implementing em_mask_key() is enough to get l3fwd
> > working. However to me this ifdef seems tricky. How should a scalar
> > implementation handle the xmm_t type? rte_xmm_t looks like an API
> > type/unio
>
> On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 08:31:03AM +, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
> > Hi Stanislaw,
> >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 09:44:54PM +, Honnappa Nagarahalli wrote:
> > >
> > > > [Honnappa] Sorry, I do not understand this. I see that vector code is
> > > > under compile time flag a
On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 08:31:03AM +, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
> Hi Stanislaw,
>
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 09:44:54PM +, Honnappa Nagarahalli wrote:
> >
> > > [Honnappa] Sorry, I do not understand this. I see that vector code is
> > > under compile time flag as below
> > >
> > >
Hi Stanislaw,
>
> On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 09:44:54PM +, Honnappa Nagarahalli wrote:
>
> > [Honnappa] Sorry, I do not understand this. I see that vector code is under
> > compile time flag as below
> >
> > #if defined RTE_ARCH_X86 || defined __ARM_NEON
> > l3fwd_em_se
On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 09:44:54PM +, Honnappa Nagarahalli wrote:
> [Honnappa] Sorry, I do not understand this. I see that vector code is under
> compile time flag as below
>
> #if defined RTE_ARCH_X86 || defined __ARM_NEON
> l3fwd_em_send_packets(nb_rx, pkts_burst,
>
>
> >
> > >
> > > In fact, l3fwd is also quite big and complex:
> > > $ wc -l examples/l3fwd/*.[h,c] |grep total
> > > 6969 total
> > >
> > > Plus it will introduce extra dependencies (fib, lpm, hash, might-be
> > > acl?) I am not sure it is a good idea to pull all these complexities into
> >
On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 12:48 PM Bruce Richardson
mailto:bruce.richard...@intel.com>> wrote:
> I do not suggest pulling all these in. In our case, I see that the ask is
> only on LPM. I am open to hearing what others see as the requirement.
>
I think fib is the planned long-term replacement fo
28/04/2021 13:04, Stanisław Kardach:
> On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 12:48 PM Bruce Richardson <
> bruce.richard...@intel.com> wrote:
>
>
> > > I do not suggest pulling all these in. In our case, I see that the ask
> > is only on LPM. I am open to hearing what others see as the requirement.
> > >
> > I
28/04/2021 12:48, Bruce Richardson:
> On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 11:17:24PM +, Honnappa Nagarahalli wrote:
>
> > Yes, this is what we have done. It is a new forwarding mode.
> > We could remove some forwarding modes from testpmd. For ex: macfwd, macswap
> > seem very similar to iofwd mode.
>
>
On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 12:48 PM Bruce Richardson <
bruce.richard...@intel.com> wrote:
> > I do not suggest pulling all these in. In our case, I see that the ask
> is only on LPM. I am open to hearing what others see as the requirement.
> >
> I think fib is the planned long-term replacement for l
>
>
> >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 27 Apr 2021 10:50:20 +0100
> > > > Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Agree that it may help testing to have l3fwd support on the testpmd.
> > > > >
> > > > > Two concerns,
> > > > > 1) Testpmd already too complex.
> > > > > 2) Code duplication.
> > > > >
> >
> > > On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 12:01 AM Honnappa Nagarahalli
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hello,
> > > > Performance of L3fwd example application is one
> > > > of the key
> > > benchmarks in DPDK. How
On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 11:17:24PM +, Honnappa Nagarahalli wrote:
> Yes, this is what we have done. It is a new forwarding mode.
> We could remove some forwarding modes from testpmd. For ex: macfwd, macswap
> seem very similar to iofwd mode.
I'd suggest removing one of those two, but not bot
> > > > > This discussion has ended up as a stats discussion. But, we also need
> to be able to change the configurable parameters easily.
> > > > > If we implement the stats and ability to change the configurable
> > > > > parameters, then it is essentially bringing in some of the
> > > > > capa
> > On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 12:01 AM Honnappa Nagarahalli
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > > Performance of L3fwd example application is one
> > > of the key
> > benchmarks in DPDK. However, the appli
>
> > >
> > > On Tue, 27 Apr 2021 10:50:20 +0100
> > > Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> > >
> > > > Agree that it may help testing to have l3fwd support on the testpmd.
> > > >
> > > > Two concerns,
> > > > 1) Testpmd already too complex.
> > > > 2) Code duplication.
> > > >
> > > > For 1), if the l3fwd c
> >
> > On Tue, 27 Apr 2021 10:50:20 +0100
> > Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> >
> > > Agree that it may help testing to have l3fwd support on the testpmd.
> > >
> > > Two concerns,
> > > 1) Testpmd already too complex.
> > > 2) Code duplication.
> > >
> > > For 1), if the l3fwd can be implemented in test
>
> On Tue, 27 Apr 2021 10:50:20 +0100
> Ferruh Yigit wrote:
>
> > Agree that it may help testing to have l3fwd support on the testpmd.
> >
> > Two concerns,
> > 1) Testpmd already too complex.
> > 2) Code duplication.
> >
> > For 1), if the l3fwd can be implemented in testpmd as new, independ
On Tue, 27 Apr 2021 10:50:20 +0100
Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> Agree that it may help testing to have l3fwd support on the testpmd.
>
> Two concerns,
> 1) Testpmd already too complex.
> 2) Code duplication.
>
> For 1), if the l3fwd can be implemented in testpmd as new, independent
> forwarding mode,
On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 01:11:43PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 27/04/2021 11:57, Ananyev, Konstantin:
> > From: Yigit, Ferruh
> > > On 4/26/2021 9:46 PM, Honnappa Nagarahalli wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 12:01 AM Honnappa
> > > Nagarahalli wrote:
> > > >>
27/04/2021 11:57, Ananyev, Konstantin:
> From: Yigit, Ferruh
> > On 4/26/2021 9:46 PM, Honnappa Nagarahalli wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 12:01 AM Honnappa
> > Nagarahalli wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > > Performance of L3f
> david.march...@redhat.com; Richardson, Bruce
> ; jer...@marvell.com; hemant.agra...@nxp.com;
> Ananyev, Konstantin ;
> Stephen Hemminger ; nd
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] L3fwd mode in testpmd
>
> On 4/26/2021 9:46 PM, Honnappa Nagarahalli wrote:
> >
> >
>
On 4/26/2021 9:46 PM, Honnappa Nagarahalli wrote:
>
>
On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 12:01 AM Honnappa
Nagarahalli wrote:
>
> Hello,
> Performance of L3fwd example application
> is one of the key
benchma
On 4/26/21 11:46 PM, Honnappa Nagarahalli wrote:
>
>
On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 12:01 AM Honnappa
Nagarahalli wrote:
>
> Hello,
> Performance of L3fwd example application
> is one of the key
benchmar
> > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 12:01 AM Honnappa
> > > > > > > > > > > Nagarahalli wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Hello,
> > > > > > > > > > > > Performance of L3fwd example application
> > > > > > > > > > > > is one of the key
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 12:01 AM Honnappa Nagarahalli
> > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Hello,
> > > > > > > > > > > Performance of L3fwd example application is
> > > > > > > > > > > one of the key
> > > > > > > > > > benchmarks in
On Mon, 26 Apr 2021 15:14:59 +0530
Jerin Jacob wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 24, 2021 at 5:56 AM Honnappa Nagarahalli
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 12:01 AM Honnappa Nagarahalli
> > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Hello,
> > > >
On Sat, Apr 24, 2021 at 5:56 AM Honnappa Nagarahalli
wrote:
>
>
>
> > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 12:01 AM Honnappa Nagarahalli
> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Hello,
> > > > > > > > > > Performance of L3fwd example application is one
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 12:01 AM Honnappa Nagarahalli
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Hello,
> > > > > > > > > Performance of L3fwd example application is one
> > > > > > > > > of the key
> > > > > > > > benchmarks in DPDK. However, the applicat
On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 5:51 AM Honnappa Nagarahalli
wrote:
>
>
>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 12:01 AM Honnappa Nagarahalli
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hello,
> > > > > > > > Performance of L3fwd example application is one of
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 12:01 AM Honnappa Nagarahalli
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hello,
> > > > > > > Performance of L3fwd example application is one of
> > > > > > > the key
> > > > > > benchmarks in DPDK. However, the application does not hav
gt; > ; Dharmik Thakkar
> > ; Ruifeng Wang ;
> > david.march...@redhat.com; Bruce Richardson
> > ; jer...@marvell.com;
> > hemant.agra...@nxp.com; Ferruh Yigit ; Ananyev,
> > Konstantin ; Stephen Hemminger
> > ; nd ; nd
> > Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] L3fwd mo
n
> ; jer...@marvell.com;
> hemant.agra...@nxp.com; Ferruh Yigit ; Ananyev,
> Konstantin ; Stephen Hemminger
> ; nd ; nd
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] L3fwd mode in testpmd
>
>
>
> > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 12:01 AM Honnappa Nagara
> >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 12:01 AM Honnappa Nagarahalli
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hello,
> > > > Performance of L3fwd example application is one of the key
> > > benchmarks in DPDK. However, the application does not have many
> > > debugging statistics to understand the
11/03/2021 16:18, Honnappa Nagarahalli:
>
>
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 12:01 AM Honnappa Nagarahalli
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > > Performance of L3fwd example application is one of the key
> > benchmarks in DPDK. However, the application does not have many
> > debugging stat
>
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 12:01 AM Honnappa Nagarahalli
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> > Performance of L3fwd example application is one of the key
> benchmarks in DPDK. However, the application does not have many
> debugging statistics to understand the performance issues. We have added
>
On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 12:01 AM Honnappa Nagarahalli
wrote:
>
> Hello,
> Performance of L3fwd example application is one of the key benchmarks
> in DPDK. However, the application does not have many debugging statistics to
> understand the performance issues. We have added L3fwd as anoth
Hello,
Performance of L3fwd example application is one of the key benchmarks
in DPDK. However, the application does not have many debugging statistics to
understand the performance issues. We have added L3fwd as another mode/stream
to testpmd which provides enough statistics at various l
40 matches
Mail list logo
