at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Maximum possible throughput with the KNI DPDK
Application
[+dev at dpdk.org<mailto:dev at dpdk.org>]
Sure, I understand that.
The 7Gb/s performance with iperf that I was getting was with one end-host using
the KNI app and the other host runni
bridge, etc., the performance bottle neck is not
>> in DPDK part anymore. You can try more queues/threads to see if performance
>> is better. But do not expect too much!
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Helin
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Malveeka Tewari [
Hi Malveeka
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Malveeka Tewari
> Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2014 6:51 AM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] Maximum possible throughput with the KNI DPDK
> Application
>
&g
wrote:
> Hi Malveeka
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Malveeka Tewari
> > Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2014 6:51 AM
> > To: dev at dpdk.org
> > Subject: [dpdk-dev] Maximum possible throughput with t
Hi all
I've been playing the with DPDK API to send out packets using the l2fwd app
and the Kernel Network Interface app with a single Intel 82599 NIC on an
Intel Xeon E5-2630
With the l2fwd application, I've been able to achieve 14.88 Mpps with
minimum sized packets.
However, running iperf with t
5 matches
Mail list logo