[dpdk-dev] Minimum Supported x86 microarchitecture

2015-04-15 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 03:09:39PM +, Kavanagh, Mark B wrote: > Hi, > > The recent reimplementation of rte_memcpy in DPDK v2.0.0 seems to have a > placed an implicit floor on the microarchitecture/Instruction set supported > by DPDK. > > For example, I can't compile head of OVS against DPDK

[dpdk-dev] Minimum Supported x86 microarchitecture

2015-04-15 Thread Kavanagh, Mark B
>-Original Message- >From: Richardson, Bruce >Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 5:05 PM >To: Kavanagh, Mark B >Cc: dev at dpdk.org >Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Minimum Supported x86 microarchitecture > >On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 03:09:39PM +, Kavanagh, Mark B wrote:

[dpdk-dev] Minimum Supported x86 microarchitecture

2015-04-15 Thread Kavanagh, Mark B
Hi, The recent reimplementation of rte_memcpy in DPDK v2.0.0 seems to have a placed an implicit floor on the microarchitecture/Instruction set supported by DPDK. For example, I can't compile head of OVS against DPDK 2.0 with gcc without passing the 'msse3' flag; this points to an implicit minim