Re: [dpdk-dev] No packets received if burst is too small in rte_eth_rx_burst

2016-12-19 Thread Thomas Monjalon
2016-12-19 10:25, Bruce Richardson: > On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 11:43:25AM +0100, tom.barbe...@ulg.ac.be wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Your comments made me saw the line "PMD: i40e_set_rx_function(): Vector rx > > enabled, please make sure RX burst size no less than 4 (port=0)." > > > > The problem was p

Re: [dpdk-dev] No packets received if burst is too small in rte_eth_rx_burst

2016-12-19 Thread Bruce Richardson
> > Tom Barbette > PhD Student @ Université de Liège > > Office 1/13 > Bâtiment B37 > Quartier Polytech > Allée de la découverte, 12 > 4000 Liège > > 04/366 91 75 > 0479/60 94 63 > > > - Mail original - > De: "Bruce Richar

Re: [dpdk-dev] No packets received if burst is too small in rte_eth_rx_burst

2016-12-17 Thread tom . barbette
66 91 75 0479/60 94 63 - Mail original - De: "Bruce Richardson" À: "tom barbette" Cc: dev@dpdk.org Envoyé: Mercredi 14 Décembre 2016 17:52:21 Objet: Re: [dpdk-dev] No packets received if burst is too small in rte_eth_rx_burst On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 04:13:53PM +

Re: [dpdk-dev] No packets received if burst is too small in rte_eth_rx_burst

2016-12-14 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 04:13:53PM +0100, tom.barbe...@ulg.ac.be wrote: > Hi list, > > Between 2.2.0 and 16.04 (up to at least 16.07.2 if not current), with the > XL710 controller I do not get any packet when calling rte_eth_rx_burst if > nb_pkts is too small. I would say smaller than 32. The in

[dpdk-dev] No packets received if burst is too small in rte_eth_rx_burst

2016-12-14 Thread tom . barbette
Hi list, Between 2.2.0 and 16.04 (up to at least 16.07.2 if not current), with the XL710 controller I do not get any packet when calling rte_eth_rx_burst if nb_pkts is too small. I would say smaller than 32. The input rate is not big, if that helps. But It should definitely get at least one pac