On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 4:23 PM Ajit Khaparde
wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 1:03 PM Thomas Monjalon
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> A bit of context: David is going to implement a test in DTS
>> for promiscuous mode:
>> http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/features.html#promiscuous-mode
>>
>> 24/06/20
On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 1:03 PM Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A bit of context: David is going to implement a test in DTS
> for promiscuous mode:
> http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/features.html#promiscuous-mode
>
> 24/06/2020 18:18, David Liu:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > From my understanding, the pro
Small bit of context here, the described case already exists in the DTS
Dynamic Config tests. So, would the other corner cases and "modes" justify
additional test case development, etc.
On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 4:03 PM Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A bit of context: David is going to implemen
Hi,
A bit of context: David is going to implement a test in DTS
for promiscuous mode:
http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/nics/features.html#promiscuous-mode
24/06/2020 18:18, David Liu:
> Hi all,
>
> From my understanding, the promiscuous mode feature will verify the
> functionality of promiscuous mode
Hi all,
>From my understanding, the promiscuous mode feature will verify the
functionality of promiscuous mode when it is on or off. The plan for
testing this feature is as follows:
Sending over a packet to verify the ports are working properly before any
testing. First to verify the promiscuous
5 matches
Mail list logo