Re: [dpdk-dev] Question about recent change to rte_mbuf struct - user data and udata64 feels (breaks SPDK)

Great, thanks for the quick response!! -Paul From: Thomas Monjalon Date: Thursday, November 19, 2020 at 2:30 AM To: Luse, Paul E Cc: dev@dpdk.org , olivier.m...@6wind.com Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Question about recent change to rte_mbuf struct - user data and udata64 feels (breaks SPDK) Hi

Re: [dpdk-dev] Question about recent change to rte_mbuf struct - user data and udata64 feels (breaks SPDK)

Hi, 19/11/2020 01:17, Luse, Paul E: > Hi, > > Recently this patch > https://github.com/DPDK/dpdk/commit/5284adad3e95025f9901869f581c8c04ea642d32 > made the following change: > > * mbuf: Removed the unioned fields ``userdata`` and ``udata64`` > from the structure ``rte_mbuf``. It is replaced

[dpdk-dev] Question about recent change to rte_mbuf struct - user data and udata64 feels (breaks SPDK)

Hi, Recently this patch https://github.com/DPDK/dpdk/commit/5284adad3e95025f9901869f581c8c04ea642d32 made the following change: * mbuf: Removed the unioned fields ``userdata`` and ``udata64`` from the structure ``rte_mbuf``. It is replaced with dynamic fields. Which breaks the SPDK project’