>
> Let me know if this works for you.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> - Greg
>
>
>
> *From:* Rose, Gregory V
> *Sent:* Thursday, April 7, 2016 4:43 PM
> *To:* bharath paulraj ; Qiu, Michael <
> michael.qiu at intel.com>
> *Cc:* Zhang,
l.com>>; dev at dpdk.org<mailto:dev at dpdk.org>; Jayakumar, Muthurajan
mailto:muthurajan.jayakumar at intel.com>>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Reg: promiscuous mode on VF
Hi Team,
May I have some update on my previous mail? I am here stuck in flow creation.
Thanks,
Bharath
On Thu
From: Zhang, Helin
>>> > Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2016 9:04 AM
>>> > To: bharath paulraj >> > <mailto:bharathpaul at gmail.com>>; Lu, Wenzhuo >> > intel.com
>>> > <mailto:wenzhuo.lu at intel.com>>; Rowden, A
Only when all three of these are in
>> > place will the feature work.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> >
>> > - Greg
>> >
>> > -Original Message-
>> > From: Zhang, Helin
>> > Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2016 9
mailto:michael.qiu at intel.com>>; Jayakumar,
> > Muthurajan > <mailto:muthurajan.jayakumar at intel.com>>
> > Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] Reg: promiscuous mode on VF
> >
> > Hi Bharath
> >
> > For your question of "why
gt; Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2016 9:04 AM
> To: bharath paulraj ; Lu, Wenzhuo <
> wenzhuo.lu at intel.com>; Rowden, Aaron F ; Rose,
> Gregory V
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Qiu, Michael ; Jayakumar,
> Muthurajan
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] Reg: promiscuous mode on VF
>
> Hi Bharath
&g
Hi Lu,
Many thanks for your response. Again I have few more queries.
If VF unicast promiscuous mode is not supported then can't we implement a
Layer 2 bridging functionality using intel virtualization technologies? Or
Is there any other way, say tweeking some hardware registers or drivers,
which
elin
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2016 9:04 AM
To: bharath paulraj ; Lu, Wenzhuo ; Rowden, Aaron F ; Rose, Gregory V
Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Qiu, Michael ; Jayakumar,
Muthurajan
Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] Reg: promiscuous mode on VF
Hi Bharath
For your question of "why intel does not support uni
Wednesday, March 16, 2016 11:29 PM
> To: Lu, Wenzhuo
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Reg: promiscuous mode on VF
>
> Hi Lu,
>
> Many thanks for your response. Again I have few more queries.
> If VF unicast promiscuous mode is not supported then can't we i
Hi Bharath,
I believe security is the only reason.
But I think there?s another way to implement a l2 bridge. Include Michael, he
can share some experience.
Thanks.
Hi Bharath,
> 2) Is the above supported for 82599 controller? If it is supported in the
> NIC,
> please provide the steps to enable.
Talking about 82599, VF unicast promiscuous mode is not supported. Only
broadcast and multicast can be supported.
>
> Thanks,
> Bharath Paulraj
Hi Team,
We are facing an issue when we are trying to implement Layer 2 bridging
functionality over the Virtual function.
*Requirement:*
We need to create four VMs and each VM should run in promiscuous mode
for a specific VLAN, so that it can receive packets for that VLAN and all
the
12 matches
Mail list logo
