07/07/2021 21:04, Honnappa Nagarahalli:
>
>
> >
> > In the deprecation notices of DPDK 21.05, we can still read this:
> > "
> > * rte_atomicNN_xxx: These APIs do not take memory order parameter. This
> > does
> > not allow for writing optimized code for all the CPU architectures
> > supported
>
> In the deprecation notices of DPDK 21.05, we can still read this:
> "
> * rte_atomicNN_xxx: These APIs do not take memory order parameter. This
> does
> not allow for writing optimized code for all the CPU architectures supported
> in DPDK. DPDK will adopt C11 atomic operations semantics
On Mon, 5 Jul 2021 08:33:21 +
Ruifeng Wang wrote:
> >
> > > > One simple example: increment a counter atomically.
> > > > __atomic_fetch_add(&counter, 1, __ATOMIC_RELAXED); or
> > > > __atomic_add_fetch(&counter, 1, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
> >
> > I really hate how atomics are "documented" i
en ;
> nd
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] atomic operations
>
> 05/07/2021 09:00, Ruifeng Wang:
> > From: Thomas Monjalon
> > > 03/07/2021 13:29, Thomas Monjalon:
> > > > In the deprecation notices of DPDK 21.05, we can still read this:
> > > >
05/07/2021 09:00, Ruifeng Wang:
> From: Thomas Monjalon
> > 03/07/2021 13:29, Thomas Monjalon:
> > > In the deprecation notices of DPDK 21.05, we can still read this:
> > > "
> > > * rte_atomicNN_xxx: These APIs do not take memory order parameter.
> > This does
> > > not allow for writing optimi
dk.org;
> david.march...@redhat.com; David Christensen
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] atomic operations
>
> 03/07/2021 13:29, Thomas Monjalon:
> > In the deprecation notices of DPDK 21.05, we can still read this:
> > "
> > * rte_atomicNN_xxx: These APIs do not take memory
03/07/2021 19:30, Stephen Hemminger:
> Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > It is very difficult to find which wrapper to use.
> >
> > This is the guide we have:
> > https://doc.dpdk.org/guides/prog_guide/writing_efficient_code.html#locks-and-atomic-operations
> > There are 2 blog posts:
> > https://www.dp
03/07/2021 13:29, Thomas Monjalon:
> In the deprecation notices of DPDK 21.05, we can still read this:
> "
> * rte_atomicNN_xxx: These APIs do not take memory order parameter. This does
> not allow for writing optimized code for all the CPU architectures supported
> in DPDK. DPDK will adopt C11
On Sat, 03 Jul 2021 13:29:38 +0200
Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> In the deprecation notices of DPDK 21.05, we can still read this:
> "
> * rte_atomicNN_xxx: These APIs do not take memory order parameter. This does
> not allow for writing optimized code for all the CPU architectures supported
> in
In the deprecation notices of DPDK 21.05, we can still read this:
"
* rte_atomicNN_xxx: These APIs do not take memory order parameter. This does
not allow for writing optimized code for all the CPU architectures supported
in DPDK. DPDK will adopt C11 atomic operations semantics and provide wrap
10 matches
Mail list logo
