Re: [dpdk-dev] coding style question - c99 comments

2020-01-24 Thread Lance Richardson
Thanks, a patch adding C99_COMMENT_TOLERANCE has been posted. Lance On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 12:10 PM Ferruh Yigit wrote: > On 1/23/2020 4:43 PM, Lance Richardson wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 11:15 AM Stephen Hemminger > > wrote: > >> > >> On Thu, 23 Jan 2020 11:05:58 -0500 > >> Lance

Re: [dpdk-dev] coding style question - c99 comments

2020-01-24 Thread Ferruh Yigit
On 1/23/2020 4:43 PM, Lance Richardson wrote: > On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 11:15 AM Stephen Hemminger > wrote: >> >> On Thu, 23 Jan 2020 11:05:58 -0500 >> Lance Richardson wrote: >> >>> The DPDK Coding Style document doesn't mention the use of c99 comments >>> using '//' as a comment delimiter, but

Re: [dpdk-dev] coding style question - c99 comments

2020-01-23 Thread Lance Richardson
On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 11:15 AM Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > On Thu, 23 Jan 2020 11:05:58 -0500 > Lance Richardson wrote: > > > The DPDK Coding Style document doesn't mention the use of c99 comments > > using '//' as a comment delimiter, but it does say that traditional > > '/* */' comment > >

Re: [dpdk-dev] coding style question - c99 comments

2020-01-23 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Thu, 23 Jan 2020 11:05:58 -0500 Lance Richardson wrote: > The DPDK Coding Style document doesn't mention the use of c99 comments > using '//' as a comment delimiter, but it does say that traditional > '/* */' comment > delimiters should be used and therefore seems to imply that c99-style comm

[dpdk-dev] coding style question - c99 comments

2020-01-23 Thread Lance Richardson
The DPDK Coding Style document doesn't mention the use of c99 comments using '//' as a comment delimiter, but it does say that traditional '/* */' comment delimiters should be used and therefore seems to imply that c99-style comments are not allowed. Is this correct? Lance