dk.org] On Behalf Of Clearasu
> Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2016 2:38 AM
> To: Lu, Wenzhuo
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] is ixgbe supporting multi-segment mbuf?
>
> Hi Wenzhuo,
>
> Thanks. For some reason, we have to stick to dpdk 2.0 for now. Is
> mul
Hi Clarylin,
> -Original Message-
> From: Clearasu [mailto:clearasu at gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2016 9:38 AM
> To: Lu, Wenzhuo
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] is ixgbe supporting multi-segment mbuf?
>
> Hi Wenzhuo,
>
> Thank
Hi Clarylin,
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Clarylin L
> Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2016 4:24 AM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] is ixgbe supporting multi-segment mbuf?
>
> ixgbe_recv_scattered_pkts
Lu, Wenzhuo wrote:
>
>
> Hi Clarylin,
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Clarylin L
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2016 4:24 AM
>> To: dev at dpdk.org
>> Subject: [
ixgbe_recv_scattered_pkts was set to be the rx function. Receiving packets
smaller than mbuf size works perfectly. However, if an incoming packet is
greater than the maximum acceptable length of one ?mbuf? data size,
receiving does not work. In this case, isn't it supposed to use
mbuf chaining to r
5 matches
Mail list logo
