2015-07-23 10:29, Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio:
> On 23/07/2015 09:12, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 2015-07-23 08:34, Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio:
> >> On 22/07/2015 11:40, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> >>> Sergio,
> >>>
> >>> As the maintainer of memory allocation, would you consider using
> >>> libhugetlbfs in D
Hi Sergio
>Then there is the issue with multi-process; because they return a file
> descriptor while
>unlinking the file, we would need some sort of Inter-Process
That's kind of what VFIO does for multiprocess, so you may want to look at that
in case you decide to get down that route :)
On 23/07/2015 09:12, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2015-07-23 08:34, Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio:
>> On 22/07/2015 11:40, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>>> Sergio,
>>>
>>> As the maintainer of memory allocation, would you consider using
>>> libhugetlbfs in DPDK for Linux?
>>> It may simplify a part of our memory a
2015-07-23 08:34, Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio:
> On 22/07/2015 11:40, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > Sergio,
> >
> > As the maintainer of memory allocation, would you consider using
> > libhugetlbfs in DPDK for Linux?
> > It may simplify a part of our memory allocator and avoid some potential
> > bugs whic
On 22/07/2015 11:40, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> Sergio,
>
> As the maintainer of memory allocation, would you consider using
> libhugetlbfs in DPDK for Linux?
> It may simplify a part of our memory allocator and avoid some potential
> bugs which would be already fixed in the dedicated lib.
I did have
Sergio,
As the maintainer of memory allocation, would you consider using
libhugetlbfs in DPDK for Linux?
It may simplify a part of our memory allocator and avoid some potential
bugs which would be already fixed in the dedicated lib.
6 matches
Mail list logo
