[dpdk-dev] lpm patches

2016-02-01 Thread Matthew Hall
On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 01:51:29AM +0100, Nikita Kozlov wrote: > Hello, > I wanted to know if there was something new or if I can help on this topic ? > I'm using rte_lpm in a project so I may (at least) do some tests or reviews. If you search the archive of the list some patch came out recently w

[dpdk-dev] lpm patches

2016-02-01 Thread Nikita Kozlov
On 10/30/2015 11:25 PM, Matthew Hall wrote: > On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 09:55:16PM +, Bruce Richardson wrote: >> We'll see what we can do in 2.3 timeframe. > Thanks for taking all of this up and helping us make a solid plan. I'll do my > best to help out from the community side. I have done some

[dpdk-dev] lpm patches

2015-10-30 Thread Vladimir Medvedkin
Hi all, 2015-10-30 20:59 GMT+03:00 Matthew Hall : > On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 12:00:18PM +, Bruce Richardson wrote: > > Matthew's patches were attachments, I don't think they came through in > patchwork > > correctly :-(, but that is the relevant link there anyway.] > > Let me know if there is

[dpdk-dev] lpm patches

2015-10-30 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 10:34:54PM +0300, Vladimir Medvedkin wrote: > Hi all, > > 2015-10-30 20:59 GMT+03:00 Matthew Hall : > > > On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 12:00:18PM +, Bruce Richardson wrote: > > > Matthew's patches were attachments, I don't think they came through in > > patchwork > > > corr

[dpdk-dev] lpm patches

2015-10-30 Thread Matthew Hall
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 09:55:16PM +, Bruce Richardson wrote: > We'll see what we can do in 2.3 timeframe. Thanks for taking all of this up and helping us make a solid plan. I'll do my best to help out from the community side. I have done some lightweight functionality tests of my patched LP

[dpdk-dev] lpm patches

2015-10-30 Thread Bruce Richardson
Hi all, there have been a lot of patches submitted in the 2.2 release cycle with extensions to the LPM library. [Referring to just LPM for IPv4 here] Given the fact that we now have - by my count - four different patchsets to extend this lib, we probably need to take some time to reconcile the d

[dpdk-dev] lpm patches

2015-10-30 Thread Matthew Hall
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 12:00:18PM +, Bruce Richardson wrote: > Matthew's patches were attachments, I don't think they came through in > patchwork > correctly :-(, but that is the relevant link there anyway.] Let me know if there is something I can do better there. I was having a difficult