Re: [dpdk-dev] SR-IOV with vfio-pci

2019-09-26 Thread Deepak Gowda
Here it is. OS : Debian 9.4 Card info: driver: ixgbe version: 4.4.0-k firmware-version: 0x8838 expansion-rom-version: bus-info: :04:00.0 supports-statistics: yes supports-test: yes supports-eeprom-access: yes supports-register-dump: yes supports-priv-flags: no -DG On Thu, 26 Sep 2019 at

Re: [dpdk-dev] SR-IOV with vfio-pci

2019-09-26 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Thu, 26 Sep 2019 11:57:04 +0530 Deepak Gowda wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to run test-pmd application with virtual functions bound to > vfio-pci. > I'm able to bind and unbind the virtual functions from ixgbevf to vfio-pci > and vice-versa > And i'm seeing the below VF Initialization failure e

Re: [dpdk-dev] SR-IOV with vfio-pci

2019-09-26 Thread Deepak Gowda
Hi Bruce, Thank you for the quick response. No it didn't work with igb_uio either. The reason is, I had made a mistake, When i created VFs on top of the 10G card, that interface was down actually. but i proceeded anyway because i could see mac on these vfs from "ifconfig -a". After a bit of looki

Re: [dpdk-dev] SR-IOV with vfio-pci

2019-09-26 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 11:57:04AM +0530, Deepak Gowda wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to run test-pmd application with virtual functions bound to > vfio-pci. > I'm able to bind and unbind the virtual functions from ixgbevf to vfio-pci > and vice-versa > And i'm seeing the below VF Initialization fail

[dpdk-dev] SR-IOV with vfio-pci

2019-09-25 Thread Deepak Gowda
Hi, I'm trying to run test-pmd application with virtual functions bound to vfio-pci. I'm able to bind and unbind the virtual functions from ixgbevf to vfio-pci and vice-versa And i'm seeing the below VF Initialization failure error, i can't seem to figure out what's going wrong here, EAL: using

[dpdk-dev] SR-IOV set_mc_addr_list differences in i40evf and ixgbevf drivers

2019-07-22 Thread Anthony Dempsey
Hi, In the i40evf driver when trying to add a list of addresses that contains the broadcast MAC address the call to i40evf_set_mc_addr_list will error out complaining that the broadcast address isn't a valid address. I haven't seen this happen in a similar set up using the ixgbevf driver. Is this

[dpdk-dev] SR-IOV - Spoofed packets detected on Intel Corporation 82599EB 2-port 10G NIC Card

2018-05-08 Thread Edison So
Hello, I have a question about disabling anti-MAC spoofing feature on Intel 82599EB 2-port 10G NIC Card. Below is the description of the issue. *DPDK Version* 17.02 *Background* 1.I installed ESXi 6.5 on a Dell PowerEdge R630 with a 2-port 82599EB 10G NIC. 2.I installed two CentOS 7

[dpdk-dev] sr-iov

2017-04-09 Thread 张伟
Hi all, I have a question related to sr-iov. The problem is that there are two machines directly connected. On one machine, create an VF and assign IP to it. From another machine, ping it. VF receives the packets. ifconfig has tx increase. tcpdump shows the arp reply. But ethtool tx is 0. an

[dpdk-dev] SR-IOV: dpdk16.07 on guest and ixgbe 3.19.1 on host - will that be a problem ? (requested invalid api version)

2016-08-20 Thread Lu, Wenzhuo
HI Gopakumar, > -Original Message- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Gopakumar > Choorakkot Edakkunni > Sent: Saturday, August 20, 2016 10:57 PM > To: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: [dpdk-dev] SR-IOV: dpdk16.07 on guest and ixgbe 3.19.1 on host

[dpdk-dev] SR-IOV: dpdk16.07 on guest and ixgbe 3.19.1 on host - will that be a problem ? (requested invalid api version)

2016-08-20 Thread Gopakumar Choorakkot Edakkunni
I see the below message "requested invalid api version" on host ? Will that be an issue or is it benign ? Should I upgrade the host ixgbe to a later version ? On the host: *[69576.199458] ixgbe :88:00.1 p4p2: VF 2 requested invalid api version 3* root# lsb_release -a No LSB modules are avail

[dpdk-dev] SR-IOV/DPDK/VPP with vfio-pci

2016-07-01 Thread Chandrasekar Kannan
still there. > Thank you very much! > > Regards, > Helin > > > -Original Message- > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Chandrasekar > > Kannan > > Sent: Thursday, June 2, 2016 2:22 AM > > To: dev at dpdk.org > > S

[dpdk-dev] SR-IOV/DPDK/VPP with vfio-pci

2016-06-05 Thread Zhang, Helin
t dpdk.org > Subject: [dpdk-dev] SR-IOV/DPDK/VPP with vfio-pci > > I have been attempting to VPP (dpdk) application with SR-IOV enabled. > Using the vfio-pci driver/i40e/XL710nics/. > I'm encountering a SEGV on the i40e code path. > > Has anyone else seen this behaviour ?. &g

[dpdk-dev] SR-IOV/DPDK/VPP with vfio-pci

2016-06-01 Thread Chandrasekar Kannan
I have been attempting to VPP (dpdk) application with SR-IOV enabled. Using the vfio-pci driver/i40e/XL710nics/. I'm encountering a SEGV on the i40e code path. Has anyone else seen this behaviour ?. full mail thread discussion with vpp-dev is here - https://lists.fd.io/pipermail/vpp-dev/2016-June

[dpdk-dev] SR-IOV: API to tell VF from PF

2015-11-05 Thread Ananyev, Konstantin
> -Original Message- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Polehn, Mike A > Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2015 5:59 PM > To: Richardson, Bruce; Shaham Fridenberg > Cc: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] SR-IOV: API to tell VF from PF >

[dpdk-dev] SR-IOV: API to tell VF from PF

2015-11-05 Thread Polehn, Mike A
: Thursday, November 5, 2015 7:51 AM To: Polehn, Mike A; Shaham Fridenberg Cc: dev at dpdk.org Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] SR-IOV: API to tell VF from PF > -Original Message- > From: Polehn, Mike A > Sent: Thursday, November 5, 2015 3:43 PM > To: Richardson, Bruce ; Shaham Fridenb

[dpdk-dev] SR-IOV: API to tell VF from PF

2015-11-05 Thread Richardson, Bruce
> -Original Message- > From: Polehn, Mike A > Sent: Thursday, November 5, 2015 3:43 PM > To: Richardson, Bruce ; Shaham Fridenberg > > Cc: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] SR-IOV: API to tell VF from PF > > I can think of a very good reason to want

[dpdk-dev] SR-IOV: API to tell VF from PF

2015-11-05 Thread Polehn, Mike A
to do high value processing. Mike -Original Message- From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Bruce Richardson Sent: Thursday, November 5, 2015 1:51 AM To: Shaham Fridenberg Cc: dev at dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] SR-IOV: API to tell VF from PF On Thu, Nov 05, 2015 at 09

[dpdk-dev] SR-IOV: API to tell VF from PF

2015-11-05 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Thu, Nov 05, 2015 at 09:39:19AM +, Shaham Fridenberg wrote: > Hey all, > > Is there some API to tell VF from PF? > > Only way I found so far is deducing that from driver name in the > rte_eth_devices struct. > > Thanks, > Shaham Hi Shaham, yes, checking the driver name is probably the

[dpdk-dev] SR-IOV: API to tell VF from PF

2015-11-05 Thread Shaham Fridenberg
Hey all, Is there some API to tell VF from PF? Only way I found so far is deducing that from driver name in the rte_eth_devices struct. Thanks, Shaham

[dpdk-dev] SR-IOV - VF: allowing unicast & multicast MAC addresses

2015-10-28 Thread Shaham Fridenberg
Hey all, I upgraded from dpdk 1.8.0 to 2.1.0, and have a VM to which I attach several VFs in SR-IOV mode. I managed to use set_mc_addr_list API to allow a specific multicast address via the VF, RX side. I wonder is it possible to allow a range of multicast addresses? Allow by prefix? Couldn't

[dpdk-dev] SR-IOV and DPDK

2015-06-29 Thread Abhishek Verma
Hi, Does it make sense to test DPDK without the underlying hypervisor supporting SR-IOV? I am trying to understand DPDK by trying it out on a VM running on Virtual Box. My intent is to see packets arriving on my virtual eth ports directly into the user space, completely bypassing the guest kernel.

[dpdk-dev] SR-IOV: ixgbe spoofed packets

2015-04-28 Thread Shaham Fridenberg
Hey All, I hope that this is the right address for my question. I currently have a VM on Cisco server that runs KVM and SR-IOV is enabled. 4 VFs are attached to this VM and I try to send ARPs from SPIRENT traffic generator to the VM which its ports are VLAN tagged. Although I turned off spoof