On 10-Jun-20 4:28 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Wed, 10 Jun 2020 10:24:44 +0100
"Burakov, Anatoly" wrote:
On 09-Jun-20 4:35 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Tue, 9 Jun 2020 14:39:54 +0100
"Burakov, Anatoly" wrote:
On 09-Jun-20 2:13 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
On 6/9/2020 1:46 PM, Burakov,
On Wed, 10 Jun 2020 10:24:44 +0100
"Burakov, Anatoly" wrote:
> On 09-Jun-20 4:35 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > On Tue, 9 Jun 2020 14:39:54 +0100
> > "Burakov, Anatoly" wrote:
> >
> >> On 09-Jun-20 2:13 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> >>> On 6/9/2020 1:46 PM, Burakov, Anatoly wrote:
> On
On 10-Jun-20 11:14 AM, Francesco wrote:
Hi Anatoly
Il giorno mer 10 giu 2020 alle ore 11:24 Burakov, Anatoly
mailto:anatoly.bura...@intel.com>> ha scritto:
On 09-Jun-20 8:40 PM, Francesco wrote:
> Hi Anatoly,
>
> Thanks a lot for the detailed response!
> Good to know a
Hi Anatoly
Il giorno mer 10 giu 2020 alle ore 11:24 Burakov, Anatoly <
anatoly.bura...@intel.com> ha scritto:
> On 09-Jun-20 8:40 PM, Francesco wrote:
> > Hi Anatoly,
> >
> > Thanks a lot for the detailed response!
> > Good to know anyway there's a "fix" already done in 20.05... also
> > because
On 09-Jun-20 4:35 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Tue, 9 Jun 2020 14:39:54 +0100
"Burakov, Anatoly" wrote:
On 09-Jun-20 2:13 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
On 6/9/2020 1:46 PM, Burakov, Anatoly wrote:
On 08-Jun-20 12:03 PM, Francesco wrote:
Hi all,
I upgraded an old DPDK-based app which was using
On 09-Jun-20 8:40 PM, Francesco wrote:
Hi Anatoly,
Thanks a lot for the detailed response!
Good to know anyway there's a "fix" already done in 20.05... also
because I'm not interested in supporting secondary processes or having
shared memory...
Looking forward for the backports in stable bra
Hi Anatoly,
Thanks a lot for the detailed response!
Good to know anyway there's a "fix" already done in 20.05... also because
I'm not interested in supporting secondary processes or having shared
memory...
Looking forward for the backports in stable branches then!
Thanks!
Francesco
Il mar 9 gi
On Tue, 9 Jun 2020 14:39:54 +0100
"Burakov, Anatoly" wrote:
> On 09-Jun-20 2:13 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> > On 6/9/2020 1:46 PM, Burakov, Anatoly wrote:
> >> On 08-Jun-20 12:03 PM, Francesco wrote:
> >>> Hi all,
> >>> I upgraded an old DPDK-based app which was using DPDK 17.11 to latest DPDK
On 09-Jun-20 2:13 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
On 6/9/2020 1:46 PM, Burakov, Anatoly wrote:
On 08-Jun-20 12:03 PM, Francesco wrote:
Hi all,
I upgraded an old DPDK-based app which was using DPDK 17.11 to latest DPDK
20.05 and I noticed that if I look at "top" I see that the VIRT memory
taken by my a
On 6/9/2020 1:46 PM, Burakov, Anatoly wrote:
> On 08-Jun-20 12:03 PM, Francesco wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> I upgraded an old DPDK-based app which was using DPDK 17.11 to latest DPDK
>> 20.05 and I noticed that if I look at "top" I see that the VIRT memory
>> taken by my application is now 256.1GB while
On 08-Jun-20 12:03 PM, Francesco wrote:
Hi all,
I upgraded an old DPDK-based app which was using DPDK 17.11 to latest DPDK
20.05 and I noticed that if I look at "top" I see that the VIRT memory
taken by my application is now 256.1GB while before it was <1GB.
I've seen this same behavior with al
Hi all,
I upgraded an old DPDK-based app which was using DPDK 17.11 to latest DPDK
20.05 and I noticed that if I look at "top" I see that the VIRT memory
taken by my application is now 256.1GB while before it was <1GB.
I've seen this same behavior with also "testpmd" example... is this a known
is
12 matches
Mail list logo
