Re: 答复: 答复: [PATCH v8 12/17] net/r8169: implement Tx path

> > return rte_le_to_cpu_32(opts1); > } > > > Best Wishes, > Howard Wang > > -邮件原件- > 发件人: Thomas Monjalon > 发送时间: 2024年11月19日 15:16 > 收件人: pro_nic_d...@realtek.com; 王颢 > 抄送: dev@dpdk.org; Ferruh Yigit > 主题: Re: 答复: [PATCH v8 12/17] net/

答复: 答复: [PATCH v8 12/17] net/r8169: implement Tx path

; 王颢 抄送: dev@dpdk.org; Ferruh Yigit 主题: Re: 答复: [PATCH v8 12/17] net/r8169: implement Tx path External mail. The change below is replacing 1 rte_smp_rmb with 2 calls, so no it is not what I am asking for. Please could you check how to not calling this function at all? This series is already

Re: 答复: [PATCH v8 12/17] net/r8169: implement Tx path

The change below is replacing 1 rte_smp_rmb with 2 calls, so no it is not what I am asking for. Please could you check how to not calling this function at all? This series is already merged in the main branch, so any new change should be submitted as a new patch. Thank you 19/11/2024 07:29, 王颢:

答复: [PATCH v8 12/17] net/r8169: implement Tx path

Dear Thomas, After our discussion, we concluded that we can make the following changes. What do you think? Additionally, I may not have been very clear in my last email. Should I submit the entire series of changes as PATCH v9, or should I respond with [PATCH v9 12/17] net/r8169: implement Tx p

答复: [PATCH v8 12/17] net/r8169: implement Tx path

Dear Thomas, I will consider that. By the way, should I make the changes and then upload patch v9? Thanks! -邮件原件- 发件人: Thomas Monjalon 发送时间: 2024年11月18日 22:59 收件人: pro_nic_d...@realtek.com; 王颢 抄送: dev@dpdk.org; Ferruh Yigit 主题: Re: [PATCH v8 12/17] net/r8169: implement Tx path Ext